Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31638594›Full record

Trial reportJMIR mHealth and uHealth2019

The Effect of an App for Day-to-Day Postoperative Care Education on Patients With Total Knee Replacement: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Thomas Timmers, Loes Janssen, Walter van der Weegen, Dirk Das, Willem-Jan Marijnissen, Gerjon Hannink, Babette C van der Zwaard, Adriaan Plat, Bregje Thomassen, Jan-Willem Swen and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 14 pooled it
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 159 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Review

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Thomas TimmersInteractive Studios, Rosmalen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2534-5799
Loes JanssenMáxima MC, Veldhoven, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2060-4472
Walter van der WeegenSint Anna Hospital, Geldrop, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9389-0644
Dirk DasSint Anna Hospital, Geldrop, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1507-3723
Willem-Jan MarijnissenAlbert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3188-5844
Gerjon HanninkRadboud university medical center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9526-3775
Babette C van der ZwaardJeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2023-0471
Adriaan PlatJeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4848-9602
Bregje ThomassenHaaglanden Medical Center, 's-Gravenhage, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0965-5455
Jan-Willem SwenHaaglanden Medical Center, 's-Gravenhage, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0602-8955
Rudolf B KoolRadboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3134-487X
Frederik Okke Lambers HeerspinkVieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1962-4011
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLJeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis · NLMedisch Centrum Haaglanden · NLSt. Anna Hospital · DEAlbert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis · NLVieCuri Medisch Centrum · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients who undergo primary Total Knee Replacement surgery (TKR) are often discharged within 1-3 days after surgery. With this relatively short length of hospital stay, a patient's self-management is a crucial factor in optimizing the outcome of their treatment. In the case of TKR, self-management primarily involves adequate pain management, followed by physiotherapy exercises and daily self-care activities. Patients are educated on all these topics by hospital staff upon discharge from the hospital but often struggle to comprehend this information due to its quantity, complexity, and the passive mode of communication used to convey it.

objectiveThis study primarily aims to determine whether actively educating TKR patients with timely, day-to-day postoperative care information through an app could lead to a decrease in their level of pain compared to those who only receive standard information about their recovery through the app. In addition, physical functioning, quality of life, ability to perform physiotherapy exercises and daily self-care activities, satisfaction with information, perceived involvement by the hospital, and health care consumption were also assessed.

methodsA multicenter randomized controlled trial was performed in five Dutch hospitals. In total, 213 patients who had undergone elective, primary, unilateral TKR participated. All patients had access to an app for their smartphone and tablet to guide them after discharge. The intervention group could unlock day-to-day information by entering a personal code. The control group only received weekly, basic information. Primary (level of pain) and secondary outcomes (physical functioning, quality of life, ability to perform physiotherapy exercises and activities of daily self-care, satisfaction with information, perceived involvement by the hospital, and health care consumption) were measured using self-reported online questionnaires. All outcomes were measured weekly in the four weeks after discharge, except for physical functioning and quality of life, which were measured at baseline and at four weeks after discharge. Data was analyzed using Student t tests, chi-square tests, and linear mixed models for repeated measures.

resultsIn total, 114 patients were enrolled in the intervention group (IG) and 99 in the control group (CG). Four weeks after discharge, patients in the IG performed significantly better than patients in the CG on all dimensions of pain: pain at rest (mean 3.45 vs mean 4.59; P=.001), pain during activity (mean 3.99 vs mean 5.08; P<.001) and pain at night (mean 4.18 vs mean 5.21; P=.003). Additionally, significant differences were demonstrated in favor of the intervention group for all secondary outcomes.

conclusionsIn the four weeks following TKR, the active and day-to-day education of patients via the app significantly decreased their level of pain and improved their physical functioning, quality of life, ability to perform physiotherapy exercises and activities of daily self-care, satisfaction with information, perceived involvement by the hospital, and health care consumption compared to standard patient education. Given the rising number of TKR patients and the increased emphasis on self-management, we suggest using an app with timely postoperative care education as a standard part of care.

trial registrationNetherlands Trial Register NTR7182; https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/6992.

Indexed as

AgedArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMobile ApplicationsNetherlandsPatient Education as TopicPostoperative CareSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment Outcomeehealthpatient educationpostoperative careself-managementsmartphonetelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID31638594
PMCPMC6914303
OpenAlexW2976659513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.