Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31638232›Full record

ArticleOncology reports2019

Mutations of RAS genes in endometrial polyps.

Takashi Takeda, Kouji Banno, Yusuke Kobayashi, Masataka Adachi, Megumi Yanokura, Eiichiro Tominaga, Kenjiro Kosaki, Daisuke Aoki

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Genetic Jigsaw of Endometrial Polyps.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Endometrial polyps are non-neoplastic but harbor epithelial mutations in endometrial cancer drivers at low allelic frequencies.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Article
  5. Atypical uterine polyps show morphologic and molecular overlap with mullerian adenosarcoma but follow a benign clinical course.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takashi TakedaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160‑8582, Japan.
Kouji BannoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160‑8582, Japan.
Yusuke KobayashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160‑8582, Japan.
Masataka AdachiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160‑8582, Japan.
Megumi YanokuraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160‑8582, Japan.
Eiichiro TominagaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160‑8582, Japan.
Kenjiro KosakiCenter for Medical Genetics, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160‑8582, Japan.
Daisuke AokiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo 160‑8582, Japan.
Keio University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometrial polyps are common, yet the molecular mechanisms underlying their formation and progression remain unclear. We examined gene mutations possibly related to the pathogenesis of endometrial polyps, as well as to their clinical features. Four premenopausal patients with endometrial polyps, who were not under drug treatment, were recruited. Whole exomes of endometrial polyps and peripheral blood lymphocytes were analyzed by next‑generation sequencing, and somatic mutations were derived by subtraction. Then, 35 samples of endometrial polyps and 12 samples of atypical polypoid adenomyoma were newly recruited to validate the identified mutations by polymerase chain reaction‑reverse sequence specific oligonucleotide method. The mutations were also analyzed in separate stromal and glandular components of the polyps after laser‑capture microdissection. Whole exome sequencing revealed that KRAS mutations were the only type of mutation detectable in multiple cases (2/4). Targeted mutation analysis revealed that 16 of 35 samples (45.7%) of endometrial polyps harbored RAS mutations. Mutation‑positive cases exhibited a significantly higher number of endometrial polyps (3.25±2.70 vs. 1.74±0.87, P=0.045). Laser‑capture microdissection in NRAS‑mutated endometrial polyps revealed that both stromal and glandular components harbored RAS mutations. There was no RAS mutation in 12 samples of atypical polypoid adenomyoma. This is the first report demonstrating that pathogenic RAS mutations are frequent in non‑treated endometrial polyps. RAS mutations may have an important role in tumorigenesis and in the formation of multiple endometrial polyps.

Indexed as

MutationAdultExomeFemaleGTP PhosphohydrolasesHumansMembrane ProteinsPolypsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Uterine DiseasesGTP PhosphohydrolasesKRAS protein, humanMembrane ProteinsNRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)

Identifiers

PMID31638232
PMCPMC6826305
OpenAlexW2979088151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.