Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31638152›Full record

ArticleTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene2019

Evaluation of the Active Melioidosis Detect™ test as a point-of-care tool for the early diagnosis of melioidosis: a comparison with culture in Laos.

Maria Chiara Rizzi, Sayaphet Rattanavong, Latsaniphone Bouthasavong, Amphayvanh Seubsanith, Manivanh Vongsouvath, Viengmon Davong, Annalisa De Silvestri, Tommaso Manciulli, Paul N Newton, David A B Dance

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. A recombinase polymerase amplification lateral flow assay for rapid detection of Burkholderia pseudomallei, the causative agent of melioidosis.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2022
    Article
  9. Observational
  10. Use of RecombinantPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. BipD ofMicroorganisms · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Maria Chiara RizziUniversity of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Sayaphet RattanavongLao-Oxford-Mahosot Hospital-Wellcome Trust Research Unit (LOMWRU), Microbiology Laboratory, Mahosot Hospital, Vientiane, Lao PDR.
Latsaniphone BouthasavongLao-Oxford-Mahosot Hospital-Wellcome Trust Research Unit (LOMWRU), Microbiology Laboratory, Mahosot Hospital, Vientiane, Lao PDR.
Amphayvanh SeubsanithLao-Oxford-Mahosot Hospital-Wellcome Trust Research Unit (LOMWRU), Microbiology Laboratory, Mahosot Hospital, Vientiane, Lao PDR.
Manivanh VongsouvathLao-Oxford-Mahosot Hospital-Wellcome Trust Research Unit (LOMWRU), Microbiology Laboratory, Mahosot Hospital, Vientiane, Lao PDR.
Viengmon DavongLao-Oxford-Mahosot Hospital-Wellcome Trust Research Unit (LOMWRU), Microbiology Laboratory, Mahosot Hospital, Vientiane, Lao PDR.
Annalisa De SilvestriUniversity of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Tommaso ManciulliUniversity of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Paul N NewtonLao-Oxford-Mahosot Hospital-Wellcome Trust Research Unit (LOMWRU), Microbiology Laboratory, Mahosot Hospital, Vientiane, Lao PDR.
David A B DanceLao-Oxford-Mahosot Hospital-Wellcome Trust Research Unit (LOMWRU), Microbiology Laboratory, Mahosot Hospital, Vientiane, Lao PDR.

Funding

Antigen Detection assay for the Diagnosis of MelioidosisR42AI102482 · NIAID · INBIOS INTERNATIONAL, INC. · PI AUCOIN, DAVID P, RAYCHAUDHURI, SYAMAL X · 2014 to 2016
$2.0M
NIAID NIH HHS R42 AI102482Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 106698/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMelioidosis is difficult to diagnose clinically and culture of Burkholderia pseudomallei is the current, imperfect gold standard. However, a reliable point-of-care test (POCT) could enable earlier treatment and improve outcomes.

methodsWe evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of the Active Melioidosis Detect™ (AMD) rapid test as a POCT and determined how much it reduced the time to diagnosis compared with culture.

resultsWe tested 106 whole blood, plasma and buffy coat samples, 96 urine, 28 sputum and 20 pus samples from 112 patients, of whom 26 (23.2%) were culture-positive for B. pseudomallei. AMD sensitivity and specificity were 65.4 and 87.2%, respectively, the latter related to 10 weak positive reactions on urine samples, considered likely false positives. The positive predictive value was 60.7%, negative predictive value was 89.3% and concordance rate between operators reading the test was 95.7%; time to diagnosis decreased by a median of 23 h.

conclusionsOur findings confirm that a strongly positive AMD result can reduce the time to diagnosis of melioidosis. However, the AMD currently has a disappointing overall sensitivity, especially with blood fractions, and specificity problems when testing urine samples.

Indexed as

Point-of-Care TestingAdolescentAdultBacteriological TechniquesBurkholderia pseudomalleiEarly DiagnosisFemaleHumansImmunoassayLaosMaleMelioidosisMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificityTime FactorsYoung AdultBurkholderia pseudomalleiimmunoassayLaosmelioidosispoint-of-care technology

Identifiers

PMID31638152
PMCPMC6907004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.