ArticleNeural regeneration research2020
Changes in neurological and pathological outcomes in a modified rat spinal cord injury model with closed canal.
Article in Neural regeneration research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Animal Models of Spinal Cord Injury.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Animal models of compression spinal cord injury.Journal of neuroscience research · 2022Review
- AAV2-mediated and hypoxia response element-directed expression of bFGF in neural stem cells showed therapeutic effects on spinal cord injury in rats.Cell death & disease · 2021Article
- Collagen scaffold combined with human umbilical cord-mesenchymal stem cells transplantation for acute complete spinal cord injury.Neural regeneration research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most animal spinal cord injury models involve a laminectomy, such as the weight drop model or the transection model. However, in clinical practice, many patients undergo spinal cord injury while maintaining a relatively complete spinal canal. Thus, open spinal cord injury models often do not simulate real injuries, and few previous studies have investigated whether having a closed spinal canal after a primary spinal cord injury may influence secondary processes. Therefore, we aimed to assess the differences in neurological dysfunction and pathological changes between rat spinal cord injury models with closed and open spinal canals. Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into three groups. In the sham group, the tunnel was expanded only, without inserting a screw into the spinal canal. In the spinal cord injury with open canal group, a screw was inserted into the spinal canal to cause spinal cord injury for 5 minutes, and then the screw was pulled out, leaving a hole in the vertebral plate. In the spinal cord injury with closed canal group, after inserting a screw into the spinal canal for 5 minutes, the screw was pulled out by approximately 1.5 mm and the flat end of the screw remained in the hole in the vertebral plate so that the spinal canal remained closed; this group was the modified model, which used a screw both to compress the spinal cord and to seal the spinal canal. At 7 days post-operation, the Basso-Beattie-Bresnahan scale was used to measure changes in neurological outcomes. Hematoxylin-eosin staining was used to assess histopathology. To evaluate the degree of local secondary hypoxia, immunohistochemical staining and western blot assays were applied to detect the expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Compared with the spinal cord injury with open canal group, in the closed canal group the Basso-Beattie-Bresnahan scores were lower, cell morphology was more irregular, the percentage of morphologically normal neurons was lower, the percentages of HIF-1α- and VEGF-immunoreactive cells were higher, and HIF-1α and VEGF protein expression was also higher. In conclusion, we successfully established a rat spinal cord injury model with closed canal. This model could result in more serious neurological dysfunction and histopathological changes than in open canal models. All experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care Committee of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, China (approval No. HKDL201810) on January 30, 2018.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.