ArticleEpilepsia2019
The yield of long-term electrocardiographic recordings in refractory focal epilepsy.
Article in Epilepsia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Heart-Brain Axis in the Context of Cardiovascular Disease.Physiology (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Review
- Cardiovascular Effects of Antiseizure Medications for Epilepsy.CNS drugs · 2025Review
- Incidence and Types of Cardiac Arrhythmias in the Peri-Ictal Period in Patients Having a Generalized Convulsive Seizure.Neurology · 2024Observational
- Continuous cardiac monitoring in epilepsy: an implantable loop manual activation algorithm for improving ECG signal acquisition accuracy.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Article
- Sudden death in epilepsy: the overlap between cardiac and neurological factors.Brain communications · 2024Review
- Circular RNAs: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Perspectives in CNS Diseases.Current medical science · 2023Review
- Autonomic manifestations of epilepsy: emerging pathways to sudden death?Nature reviews. Neurology · 2021Review
- The brain-heart interaction in epilepsy: implications for diagnosis, therapy, and SUDEP prevention.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2021Review
- Early Prediction of Refractory Epilepsy in Children Under Artificial Intelligence Neural Network.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2021Article
- Ictal Asystole in Drug-Resistant Focal Epilepsy: Two Decades of Experience from an Epilepsy Monitoring Unit.Brain sciences · 2020Article
- Interictal Heart Rate Variability Analysis Reveals Lateralization of Cardiac Autonomic Control in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Article
- The yield of long-term electrocardiographic recordings in refractory focal epilepsy.Epilepsia · 2019Article
- Seizures and Cardiac Dysrhythmias: And the Beat (Sometimes) Goes On.Epilepsy currentsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the incidence of clinically relevant arrhythmias in refractory focal epilepsy and to assess the potential of postictal arrhythmias as risk markers for sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP).
methodsWe recruited people with refractory focal epilepsy without signs of ictal asystole and who had at least one focal seizure per month and implanted a loop recorder with 2-year follow-up. The devices automatically record arrhythmias. Subjects and caregivers were instructed to make additional peri-ictal recordings. Clinically relevant arrhythmias were defined as asystole ≥ 6 seconds; atrial fibrillation < 55 beats per minute (bpm), or > 200 bpm and duration > 30 seconds; persistent sinus bradycardia < 40 bpm while awake; and second- or third-degree atrioventricular block and ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation. We performed 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG) and tilt table testing to identify non-seizure-related causes of asystole.
resultsWe included 49 people and accumulated 1060 months of monitoring. A total of 16 474 seizures were reported, of which 4679 were captured on ECG. No clinically relevant arrhythmias were identified. Three people had a total of 18 short-lasting (<6 seconds) periods of asystole, resulting in an incidence of 2.91 events per 1000 patient-months. None of these coincided with a reported seizure; one was explained by micturition syncope. Other non-clinically relevant arrhythmias included paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n = 2), supraventricular tachycardia (n = 1), and sinus tachycardia with a right bundle branch block configuration (n = 1). SIGNIFICANCE: We found no clinically relevant arrhythmias in people with refractory focal epilepsy during long-term follow-up. The absence of postictal arrhythmias does not support the use of loop recorders in people at high SUDEP risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.