Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31637645›Full record

Observational studyJournal of general internal medicine2020

Poorer Physical and Mental Health Status Are Associated with Subsequent Opioid Prescriptions: a U.S. National Study.

Anthony Jerant, Alicia Agnoli, Peter Franks

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of general internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anthony JerantDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA. afjerant@ucdavis.edu.
Alicia AgnoliDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Peter FranksDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA.
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Womens Health at UC Davis - Administrative SupplementK12HD051958 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI LANE, NANCY E · 2005 to 2023
$9.6M
Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's Health at UC DavisK12AR084220 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Nancy E Lane · 2023 to 2026
$3.0M
NIAMS NIH HHS K12 AR084220NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD051958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHow physical and mental health status relate to receipt of opioid prescription remains unclear, creating uncertainty in minimizing opioid harms while avoiding pain under-treatment.

objectiveTo examine the associations of physical and mental health status with subsequent opioid prescriptions.

designObservational study of 2005-2015 United States (U.S.) Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data.

participantsAdult respondents (N = 78,563) participating for 2 years. The analyses focused on respondents reporting no opioid prescriptions in year 1 (N = 65,249). MAIN MEASURES: In the primary analysis, a negative binomial regression yielding adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs), the dependent variable was the number of opioid prescriptions in year 2. In two secondary analyses, both logistic regressions yielding adjusted odds ratios (ORs), the dependent variables were receipt of any opioid prescription (versus none) and receipt of ≥ 6 opioid prescriptions (versus 0-5) in year 2. The key independent variables in all analyses were the SF-12 Physical and Mental Component Summary scores (PCS-12 and MCS-12, respectively; higher scores = better health status). All models adjusted for socio-demographics, health-related variables, and year. KEY

resultsPrimary analysis. With each 10-point decrement in year 1 PCS-12 or MCS-12 score, there were more opioid prescriptions received in year 2 (adjusted IRRs [95% CIs] 1.45 [1.39-1.52] and 1.22 [1.16-1.27], respectively). Secondary analyses. With each 10-point decrement in year 1 PCS-12 or MCS-12 score, there were higher odds in year 2 both of receiving any opioid prescription (adjusted ORs 1.23 [1.19-1.28] and 1.11 [1.08-1.15], respectively) and of receiving ≥ 6 opioid prescriptions (adjusted ORs 1.96 [1.75-2.17] and 1.37 [1.23-1.54], respectively).

conclusionsIn a nationally representative U.S. sample, both poorer physical and mental health status independently predicted receiving more opioid prescriptions received in a subsequent year, as well as receiving ≥ 6 prescriptions during the year. Our findings may contribute to a more nuanced picture of the drivers of opioid prescription.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidPrescriptionsAdultDrug PrescriptionsHealth ExpendituresHealth StatusHumansPhysical ExaminationUnited StatesAnalgesics, Opioidanalgesicshealth statusopioidpainsurveys and questionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID31637645
PMCPMC7018871
OpenAlexW2981586332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.