Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31637639›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2020

Satisfaction with Primary Care Providers and Health Care Services Among Patients with Chronic Pain: a Mixed-Methods Study.

Inga Gruß, Alison Firemark, Carmit K McMullen, Meghan Mayhew, Lynn L DeBar

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Patient Perspectives on Opioid Risk Discussions in Primary Care.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Inga GrußKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA. inga.gruss@kpchr.org.
Alison FiremarkKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA.
Carmit K McMullenKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA.
Meghan MayhewKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA.
Lynn L DeBarKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research · USKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · US

Funding

PPACT Administrative Supplement for Research on Sleep Disturbances and Impact on Chronic PainUH3NS088731 · NINDS · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI DEBAR, LYNN L. · 2014 to 2017
$7.7M
Collaborative Care for Chronic Pain in Primary CareUH2AT007788 · NCCIH · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI DEBAR, LYNN L. · 2012 to 2012
$818k
NCCIH NIH HHS UH2 AT007788NINDS NIH HHS UH3 NS088731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic pain is a prevalent health concern in the United States (US) and a frequent reason for patients to seek primary care. The challenges associated with developing effective pain management strategies can be perceived as a burden on the patient-provider relationship.

objectiveThis study explored the relationship between patients' overall satisfaction with their primary care providers (PCPs) and their satisfaction with their chronic pain treatment, as well as the provider behaviors that contributed to chronic pain patients' satisfaction with their PCPs.

designConcurrent nested mixed-methods design

participants97 patients with chronic pain who were assigned to the usual care arm of the Pain Program for Active Coping and Training (PPACT) study. APPROACH: We analyzed phone interview and survey data (n = 97). Interviews assessed provider behaviors that led to patient satisfaction. Interview transcripts were analyzed based on a content analysis approach. Survey responses assessed patient satisfaction with primary care and pain services. We calculated a Pearson's correlation coefficient using five response categories. KEY

resultsInterviews revealed that high satisfaction with primary care was driven by five concrete PCP behaviors: (1) listening, (2) maintaining communication with patients, (3) acting as an access point to comprehensive pain care, (4) providing an honest assessment of the possibilities of pain care, and (5) taking time during consultations with patients. In surveys, participants reported higher satisfaction with their primary care services than with the pain services they received; these variables were only moderately correlated (r = 0.586).

conclusionsResults suggest that patients with chronic pain can view the relationship with their PCPs as positive, even in the face of low satisfaction with their pain treatment. The expectations that these patients held of PCPs could be met regardless of providers' ability to successfully relieve chronic pain.

Indexed as

Chronic PainPhysicians, Primary CareHumansPatient SatisfactionPersonal SatisfactionPrimary Health CareUnited Stateschronic painmixed methodsprimary care relationshiptreatment satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID31637639
PMCPMC6957630
OpenAlexW2981386211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.