Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31637555›Full record

ArticleCognitive processing2020

Medial prefrontal cortex involvement in aesthetic appreciation of paintings: a tDCS study.

Zaira Cattaneo, Chiara Ferrari, Susanna Schiavi, Ivan Alekseichuk, Andrea Antal, Marcos Nadal

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive processing, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zaira CattaneoDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy. zaira.cattaneo@unimib.it.
Chiara FerrariDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Susanna SchiaviDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Ivan AlekseichukDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Georg-August University, Goettingen, Germany.
Andrea AntalDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Georg-August University, Goettingen, Germany.
Marcos NadalHuman Evolution and Cognition Group (EvoCog), University of the Balearic Islands, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among the brain regions involved in the aesthetic evaluation of paintings, the prefrontal cortex seems to play a pivotal role. In particular, consistent neuroimaging evidence indicates that activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (mainly in the left hemisphere) and in medial and orbital sectors of the prefrontal cortex is linked to viewing aesthetically pleasing images. In this study, we focused on the contribution of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) in mediating aesthetic decisions about paintings. We found that enhancing excitability in this region via anodal tDCS led participants to judge paintings as more beautiful. Although significant, the effects were moderate, possibly due to the neutral affective value of the artworks we used, suggesting that activity in mPFC may be critically dependent on the affective impact of the paintings.

Indexed as

PaintingsDecision MakingEstheticsFemaleHumansMaleNeuroimagingPhotic StimulationPrefrontal CortexTranscranial Direct Current StimulationYoung AdultBeautyBrain stimulationMedial prefrontal cortexNeuroaestheticstDCS

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.