Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31637488›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2019

Evaluation of radial peripapillary capillary density in patients with Fuchs uveitis syndrome.

Yasin Sakir Goker, Pinar Cakar Ozdal, Yasemin Ozdamar Erol, Hasan Kızıltoprak, Mustafa Salih Karatepe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cytomegalovirus-positive Posner-Schlossman syndrome: to compare differences in retinal vessel area density between the affected and non-affected eye using optical coherence tomography angiography.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yasin Sakir GokerUniversity of Health Sciences, Ulucanlar Eye Training and Research Hospital, 06240, Ankara, Turkey. yasingoker5367@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6908-4888
Pinar Cakar OzdalUniversity of Health Sciences, Ulucanlar Eye Training and Research Hospital, 06240, Ankara, Turkey.
Yasemin Ozdamar ErolUniversity of Health Sciences, Ulucanlar Eye Training and Research Hospital, 06240, Ankara, Turkey.
Hasan KızıltoprakOphthalmology Department, Bingol Women's Health and Children's Hospital, Bingol, Turkey.
Mustafa Salih KaratepeMerzifon Kara Mustafa Pasa State Hospital, Amasya, Turkey.
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TRBingöl University · TRSivas State Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo quantitatively analyze the microcirculation in the peripapillary sectors in the affected eyes and fellow unaffected eyes of individuals with unilateral Fuchs uveitis syndrome (FUS) using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA), and to compare the radial peripapillary capillary vessel density (RPCvd) with normal and age-matched individuals.

methodsEyes were divided into three groups based on the involvement of the FUS: FUS-positive eye of patients (study eye), fellow eye of FUS-positive patients (fellow eye), and the control eye for the control group (control eye). RPCvd (%) and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness (μm) at eight equal sectors and two equal hemispheres were automatically calculated in peripapillary region via OCTA.

resultsThis study included 105 eyes of 71 patients: 34 FUS-positive eyes of 34 patients, 34 fellow eyes of FUS-positive patients, and 37 control eyes of 37 patients. RPCvd was significantly lower in study eyes than in fellow and control eyes in the peripapillary region (p = 0.044 and p = 0.005, respectively). There was no significant difference between fellow eyes and control eyes regarding RPCvd in any region (p > 0.05 for all). There were no significant differences between the three groups regarding peripapillary RNFL values (p > 0.05 for all).

conclusionOCTA is a novel technology for imaging of the RPC network in patients with FUS. Lower radial peripapillary capillary vessel density in FUS could induce capillary insufficiency and impairment of ocular blood flow to optic nerve head.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCapillariesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFluorescein AngiographyFollow-Up StudiesFundus OculiHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedNerve FibersOptic DiskRetinal Ganglion CellsRetinal VesselsFuchs uveitis syndromeOptical coherence tomography angiographyRadial peripapillary capillaryRetinal nerve fiber layerVessel density

Identifiers

PMID31637488
OpenAlexW2981726460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.