Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31637482›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2020

Good clinical practice recommendations for the use of PET/CT in oncology.

Pierre-Yves Salaün, Ronan Abgral, Olivier Malard, Solène Querellou-Lefranc, Gilles Quere, Myriam Wartski, Romain Coriat, Elif Hindie, David Taieb, Antoine Tabarin and 16 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Joint EANM-SNMMI guideline on the role of 2-[European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. EANM guideline on the role of 2-[European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Guideline
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Prognostic value of TMTV and Dmax calculated fromEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. FDG PET Hybrid Imaging.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Reducing acquisition time in O-(2-Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025
    Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Pierre-Yves SalaünDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Brest, 5 Avenue Foch, 29609, Brest, France. pierre-yves.salaun@chu-brest.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-3899-2135
Ronan AbgralDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Brest, 5 Avenue Foch, 29609, Brest, France.
Olivier MalardHead and Neck, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France.
Solène Querellou-LefrancDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Brest, 5 Avenue Foch, 29609, Brest, France.
Gilles QuereThoracic Oncology, University Hospital of Brest, Brest, France.
Myriam WartskiNuclear Medicine, Cochin Hospital AP-HP, Paris, France.
Romain CoriatGastroenterology, Cochin Hospital AP-HP, Paris, France.
Elif HindieNuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
David TaiebNuclear Medicine, AP-HM, Marseille, France.
Antoine TabarinEndocrinology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Antoine GirardNuclear Medicine, Eugène Marquis Center, Rennes, France.
Jean-François GrellierNuclear Medicine, Foch Hospital, Paris, France.
Isabelle Brenot-RossiNuclear Medicine, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France.
David GroheuxNuclear Medicine, Hopital Saint Louis AP-HP, Paris, France.
Caroline RousseauNuclear Medicine, Ouest Cancer Institute, Nantes, France.
Désirée DeandreisNuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, Citta della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
Jean-Louis AlberiniNuclear Medicine, Georges-François Leclerc center - François Mitterrand University Hospital, Dijon, France.
Caroline Bodet-MilinNuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France.
Emmanuel IttiNuclear Medicine, Henri Mondor Hospital AP-HP, Paris, France.
Olivier CasasnovasHematology, University Hospital Le Bocage, Dijon, France.
Françoise Kraeber-BodereNuclear Medicine, Ouest Cancer Institute, Nantes, France.
Philippe MoreauHematology, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France.
Arnaud PhilipCentre du traitement de la douleur, CHRU de Brest, Brest, France.
Corinne BalleyguierRadiology, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France.
Alain LucianiRadiology, Henri Mondor Hospital AP-HP, Paris, France.
Florent CachinNuclear Medicine, Jean Perrin Cancer Institute, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is a nuclear medicine functional imaging technique with proven clinical value in oncology. PET/CT indications are continually evolving with fresh advances made through research. French practice on the use of PET in oncology was framed in recommendations based on Standards-Options-Recommendations methodology and coordinated by the French federation of Comprehensive Cancer Centres (FNLCC). The recommendations were originally issued in 2002 followed by an update in 2003, but since then, a huge number of scientific papers have been published and new tracers have been licenced for market release. The aim of this work is to bring the 2003 version recommendations up to date. For this purpose, a focus group was set up in collaboration with the French Society for Nuclear Medicine (SFMN) to work on developing good clinical practice recommendations. These good clinical practice recommendations have been awarded joint French National Heath Authority (HAS) and French Cancer Institute (INCa) label status-the stamp of methodological approval. The present document is the outcome of comprehensive literature review and rigorous appraisal by a panel of experts, organ specialists, clinical oncologists, surgeons and imaging specialists. These data were also used for the EANM referral guidelines.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsNuclear MedicineHumansMedical OncologyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyComputed tomographyMethodological approvalPositron emission tomography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.