Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31637405›Full record

SynthesisThe Journal of frailty & aging2019

The Relationship between Physical Frailty and Mild Cognitive Impairment in the Elderly: A Systematic Review.

M Kiiti Borges, N Oiring de Castro Cezar, A Silva Santos Siqueira, M Yassuda, M Cesari, I Aprahamian

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Journal of frailty & aging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Frailty and cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M Kiiti BorgesMarcus Kiiti Borges, MSc, Universidade de Sao Paulo Faculdade de Medicina, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, marcuskiiti@usp.br.
N Oiring de Castro Cezar
A Silva Santos Siqueira
M Yassuda
M Cesari
I Aprahamian

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPhysical frailty (PF) appears to be associated with low cognitive performance and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). This review evaluated and synthesized the evidence of studies investigating the association between PF and MCI, the prevalence of both conditions and the rate of conversion of healthy older adult to one of them during the follow-up.

methodsA systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA recommendations in the Pubmed, SciELO and LILACS databases. Five studies were eligible according to inclusion and exclusion criteria.

resultsRegarding the study design, cross-sectional studies prevailed. Most studies showed a positive association between PF and MCI. Moreover, PF seems to predict a worse cognitive trajectory among participants with MCI and it is associated to a higher risk of developing MCI.

conclusionOur findings suggest a significant association between PF and MCI. Further longitudinal studies are needed to better explore causality.

Indexed as

AgedCognitive DysfunctionCross-Sectional StudiesFrail ElderlyFrailtyHumansPrevalenceFrailtymild cognitive impairmentsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31637405
PMCPMC12275732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.