ArticleAEM education and training2019
Thinking Critically About Appraising FOAM.
Article in AEM education and training, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Traditional and modern educational resource use in Emergency Medicine registrars (trainees) and specialists in South Africa.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2026Article
- Free Open Access Medical Education (FOAM) in emergency medicine: use and perceived clinical relevance from a large cross-sectional survey.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Barriers and Enablers to the Production of Open Access Medical Education Platforms: Scoping Review.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- Evaluating the role of traditional and nontraditional educational resources in point-of-care ultrasound training: A cross-sectional survey of educator preferences and practices.AEM education and training · 2025Article
- Development and Initial Validity Evidence for the EvaLeR Tool: Assessing Quality of Emergency Medicine Educational Resources.AEM education and training · 2025Article
- From submission to publication: A practical guide to peer review publication for medical educators.AEM education and training · 2025Review
- FOAM authorship: Who's teaching our learners?AEM education and training · 2024Article
- Weighing the gold standard: The breadth of emergency medicine core content covered by textbooks.AEM education and training · 2024Article
- Systematic online academic resource (SOAR) review: Pediatric respiratory infectious disease.AEM education and training · 2024Article
- A Fork in the Road for Emergency Medicine and Critical Care Blogs and Podcasts: Cross-sectional Study.JMIR medical education · 2022Article
- Going viral: A scoping review of the current state and impact of online research dissemination in emergency medicine.AEM education and training · 2022Article
- Good practices in harnessing social media for scholarly discourse, knowledge translation, and education.Perspectives on medical education · 2021Article
- A Short History of Free Open Access Medical Education. The Past, Present, and Future.ATS scholar · 2020Article
- Thinking Critically About Appraising FOAM.AEM education and training · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.