Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31637355›Full record

ReviewAEM education and training2019

Systematic Online Academic Resource (SOAR) Review: Renal and Genitourinary.

Andrew Grock, Anuja Bhalerao, Teresa M Chan, Brent Thoma, Annie B Wescott, N Seth Trueger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AEM education and training, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. FOAM authorship: Who's teaching our learners?AEM education and training · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. What Traditional Lectures Can Learn From Podcasts.Journal of graduate medical education · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Thinking Critically About Appraising FOAM.AEM education and training · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Embracing FOAM as an Academic Community.AEM education and training · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrew GrockDivision of Emergency Medicine Greater Los Angeles VA Healthcare System, and the Department of Emergency Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine UCLA Los Angeles CA.
Anuja BhaleraoSchool of Medicine University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.
Teresa M ChanDepartment of Medicine Division of Emergency Medicine McMaster University, and the McMaster Education Research, Innovation, and Theory Program Hamilton Ontario Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6104-462X
Brent ThomaDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon Saskatchewan Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1124-5786
Annie B WescottGalter Health Sciences Library & Learning Center Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago IL.
N Seth TruegerDepartment of Emergency Medicine Northwestern University Chicago IL.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8797-2192

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOnline resources for emergency medicine (EM) trainees and physicians have variable quality and inconsistent coverage of core topics. In this first entry of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Systematic Online Academic Resource (SOAR) series, we describe the application of a systematic methodology to comprehensively identify, collate, and curate online content for topic-specific modules.

methodsA list of module topics and related terms was generated from the American Board of Emergency Medicine's Model of the Clinical Practice of Emergency Medicine. The authors selected "renal and genitourinary" for the first module, which contained 35 terms; all MeSH headers and colloquial synonyms related to the topic and related terms were searched both within the 100 most impactful online educational websites per the Social Media Index and the FOAMsearch.net search engine. Duplicate entries, journal articles, images, and archives were excluded. The quality of each article was rated using the revised METRIQ (rMETRIQ) score.

resultsThe search yielded 13,058 online resources. After 12,717 items were excluded, 341 underwent quality assessment. All renal/genitourinary topics were covered by at least one resource. The median rMETRIQ score was 11 of 21 (interquartile range = 8-14). Calculus of urinary tract was most prominently featured with 60 posts. Thirty-four posts (10% of full-text screened FOAM articles) covering 12 core topics were identified as high quality (rMETRIQ ≥ 16).

conclusionsWe demonstrated the feasibility of systematically identifying and curating FOAM resources for a specific EM topic and identified an overrepresentation of some subtopics. This curated list of resources may guide trainees, teacher recommendations, and resource producers. Further entries in the series will address other topics relevant to EM.

Identifiers

PMID31637355
PMCPMC6795358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.