Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31637285›Full record

ArticleACS biomaterials science & engineering2019

A magnetics-based approach for fine-tuning afterload in engineered heart tissues.

Marita L Rodriguez, Tessa R Werner, Benjamin Becker, Thomas Eschenhagen, Marc N Hirt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS biomaterials science & engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Dynamic control of contractile resistance to iPSC-derived micro-heart muscle arrays.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Contractile work directly modulates mitochondrial protein levels in human engineered heart tissues.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marita L RodriguezDepartment of Experimental Pharmacology and Toxicology, Cardiovascular Research Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Tessa R WernerDepartment of Experimental Pharmacology and Toxicology, Cardiovascular Research Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Benjamin BeckerDepartment of Experimental Pharmacology and Toxicology, Cardiovascular Research Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Thomas EschenhagenDepartment of Experimental Pharmacology and Toxicology, Cardiovascular Research Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Marc N HirtDepartment of Experimental Pharmacology and Toxicology, Cardiovascular Research Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

European Research Council 340248
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Afterload plays important roles during heart development and disease progression, however, studying these effects in a laboratory setting is challenging. Current techniques lack the ability to precisely and reversibly alter afterload over time. Here, we describe a magnetics-based approach for achieving this control and present results from experiments in which this device was employed to sequentially increase afterload applied to rat engineered heart tissues (rEHTs) over a 7-day period. The contractile properties of rEHTs grown on control posts marginally increased over the observation period. The average post deflection, fractional shortening, and twitch velocities measured for afterload-affected tissues initially followed this same trend, but fell below control tissue values at high magnitudes of afterload. However, the average force, force production rate, and force relaxation rate for these rEHTs were consistently up to 3-fold higher than in control tissues. Transcript levels of hypertrophic or fibrotic markers and cell size remained unaffected by afterload, suggesting that the increased force output was not accompanied by pathological remodeling. Accordingly, the increased force output was fully reversed to control levels during a stepwise decrease in afterload over 4 hours. Afterload application did not affect systolic or diastolic tissue lengths, indicating that the afterload system was likely not a source of changes in preload strain. In summary, the afterload system developed herein is capable of fine-tuning EHT afterload while simultaneously allowing optical force measurements. Using this system, we found that small daily alterations in afterload can enhance the contractile properties of rEHTs, while larger increases can have temporary undesirable effects. Overall, these findings demonstrate the significant role that afterload plays in cardiac force regulation. Future studies with this system may allow for novel insights into the mechanisms that underlie afterload-induced adaptations in cardiac force development.

Indexed as

afterloadengineered heart tissues (EHTs)magneticsmaturation

Identifiers

PMID31637285
PMCPMC6803165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.