Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31637136›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

Comparison between two- and three-dimensional scoring of zebrafish response to psychoactive drugs: identifying when three-dimensional analysis is needed.

Simone Macrì, Romain J G Clément, Chiara Spinello, Maurizio Porfiri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Modeling zebrafish geotaxis as a feedback control process.Proceedings of the ... American Control Conference. American Control Conference · 2021
    Article
  8. Collective Emotional Contagion in Zebrafish.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Simone MacrìDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, New York University, Tandon School of Engineering, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Romain J G ClémentDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, New York University, Tandon School of Engineering, Brooklyn, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1970-8386
Chiara SpinelloDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, New York University, Tandon School of Engineering, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Maurizio PorfiriDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, New York University, Tandon School of Engineering, Brooklyn, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1480-3539

Funding

Robotics may help unravel the biological determinants of substance use disorders: studies in zebrafishR21DA042558 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI PORFIRI, MAURIZIO · 2017 to 2018
$346k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA042558
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zebrafish (

Indexed as

AnxietyAutomated trackingCitalopramEthanolNovel tank diving test

Identifiers

PMID31637136
PMCPMC6800527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.