Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31637106›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2019

Fully Automated Estimation of Spacing and Density for Retinal Mosaics.

Robert F Cooper, Geoffrey K Aguirre, Jessica I W Morgan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. In Vivo Cone Photoreceptor Topography of the Human Foveola.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Biomedical optics express · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Robert F CooperScheie Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Geoffrey K AguirreDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jessica I W MorganScheie Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · USPenn Presbyterian Medical Center · US

Funding

Scientific TransparencyP30EY001583 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Qi N Cui · 1985 to 2026
$19.5M
Platform Technologies for Microscopic Retinal Imaging: Development & TranslationU01EY025477 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DUBRA, ALFREDO · 2015 to 2019
$4.4M
Human Connectomes for Low Vision, Blindness, and Sight RestorationU01EY025864 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI AGUIRRE, GEOFFREY KARL, PATEL, VIVEK R. · 2015 to 2018
$4.0M
Retinal structure, function and response to gene therapyR01EY028601 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Jessica I.W. Morgan · 2018 to 2026
$3.6M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001583NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028601NEI NIH HHS U01 EY025477NEI NIH HHS U01 EY025864
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo introduce and validate a novel, fully automated algorithm for determining pointwise intercell distance (ICD) and cone density.

methodsWe obtained images of the photoreceptor mosaic from 14 eyes of nine subjects without retinal pathology at two time points using an adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope. To automatically determine ICD, the radial average of the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) of the image was analyzed using a multiscale, fit-based algorithm to find the modal spacing. We then converted the modal spacing to ICD by assuming a hexagonally packed mosaic. The reproducibility of the algorithm was assessed between the two datasets, and accuracy was evaluated by comparing the results against those calculated from manually identified cones. Finally, the algorithm was extended to determine pointwise ICD and density in montages by calculating modal spacing over an overlapping grid of regions of interest (ROIs).

resultsThe differences of DFT-derived ICD between the test and validation datasets were 3.2% ± 3.5% (mean ± SD), consistent with the differences in directly calculated ICD (1.9% ± 2.9%). The average ICD derived by the automated method was not significantly different between the development and validation datasets and was equivalent to the directly calculated ICD. When applied to a full montage, the automated algorithm produced estimates of cone density across retinal eccentricity that well match prior empiric measurements.

conclusionsWe created an accurate, repeatable, and fully automated algorithm for determining ICD and density in both individual ROIs and across entire montages. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The use of fully automated and validated algorithms will enable rapid analysis over the full photoreceptor montage.

Indexed as

adaptive opticscone densityphotoreceptor

Identifiers

PMID31637106
PMCPMC6798313
OpenAlexW2980878289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.