Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31637030›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2019

Invisible medicine sellers and their use of antibiotics: a qualitative study in Cambodia.

Sovanthida Suy, Sonia Rego, Sothavireak Bory, Sophea Chhorn, Socheata Phou, Chanra Prien, Sotheara Heng, Shishi Wu, Helena Legido-Quigley, Johanna Hanefeld and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Expectations Shaped Elsewhere: Refugee Experiences of Healthcare in Aotearoa New Zealand.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Multidrug-Resistant Sepsis: A Critical Healthcare Challenge.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sovanthida SuyDepartment of Public Health, University of Health Sciences, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Sonia RegoFaculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Sothavireak BoryFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Health Sciences, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Sophea ChhornUniversity of Health Sciences, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Socheata PhouDepartment of Public Health, University of Health Sciences, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Chanra PrienFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Health Sciences, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Sotheara HengUniversity of Health Sciences, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Shishi WuSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Helena Legido-QuigleyFaculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Johanna HanefeldFaculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9487-2333
Vonthanak SaphonnUniversity of Health Sciences, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Mishal S KhanFaculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R003467/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobal attention to antimicrobial resistance has increased interest in tackling the widespread inappropriate dispensing of antibiotics by informal, for-profit healthcare providers (HCPs). We provide new evidence on an understudied group of informal HCPs: invisible medicine sellers (IMS) who operate without any marked facility. We investigated factors that influence community decisions on which HCPs to purchase medicines from, focusing on reasons for using IMS, and compared different HCPs' knowledge of antibiotic use.

methodsWe conducted community focus group discussions (FGDs) in seven purposively selected villages representing high and low informal HCPs use in two peri-urban districts in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Using information from the FGDs to identify HCPs that sell medicines, we interviewed 35 participants: 21 HCPs (including five IMS) and 14 key informants, including government HCPs and village leaders. We adopted an interpretative approach and conducted a thematic analysis.

resultsCommunity members typically knew of several formal and informal HCPs selling medicines nearby, and IMS were common, as were doctors that sell medicines covertly. Two factors were most salient in influencing the choice of HCP for medicine purchasing. The first was trust in the effectiveness of medicines provided, judged by the speed of symptomatic relief. This pushed HCPs to provide several medicines, including antibiotics, at the first consultation. The second was the convenience offered by IMS and other informal HCPs: supplying medicines when other facilities are closed, accepting delayed payments, providing incomplete courses of medication and selling human antibiotics for animal use.

conclusionThis first study focusing on IMS indicates that it is important, but challenging, for public health agencies to engage with them to reduce inappropriate use of antibiotics. Although public health facilities must fill some gaps that informal HCPs are currently addressing, such as access to medicines at night, reducing demand for unnecessary antibiotics is also critical.

Indexed as

health systemspublic healthqualitative study

Identifiers

PMID31637030
PMCPMC6768357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.