ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2019
A systematic analysis of evidence for surgically accelerated orthodontics.
Review in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effect of the photobiomodulation for acceleration of the orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Lasers in medical science · 2022Pooled it
- Can computer-guided surgery help orthodontics in miniscrew insertion and corticotomies? A narrative review.Frontiers in oral health · 2023Review
- Effectiveness of surgical procedures in the acceleration of orthodontic tooth movement: Findings from systematic reviews and meta-analyses.The Japanese dental science review · 2022Review
- External Apical Root Resorption in Orthodontic Patients Who Practice Combat Sports: A Case-Control Observational Pilot Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Observational
- Corticotomy in orthodontic treatment: systematic review.Heliyon · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCorticotomy is a technique presumed as useful to decrease the time for orthodontic treatment, however, it is necessary to do a systematic review in order to determine if there is enough scientific evidence to back up the use of Corticotomy to accelerate the treatment. MATERIAL AND
methodsData was stockpiled from the electronic database such as PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus y Science Direct, according to the PRISMA linings for systematic reviews, using the following keywords: accelerated movement of the teeth AND osteotomy AND piezocision AND corticotomy AND orthodontics. Only English, Spanish and French language articles that met the criteria needed were included.
resultsIn the different accelerated orthodontics techniques, a significant reduction in the total time of orthodontic treatment was obtained. There were no major complications reported in any study. The less invasive procedures had better acceptance. DISCUSSION: The surgical approaches are not only limited to usual orthodontic treatments, but they have also been used as an alternative for the approach of a palatal fistula in a patient with bilateral cleft lip and palatine orofaciodigital syndrome Type I.
conclusionsThere has been a growing interest in the use of alveolar corticotomies as an adjunct to orthodontic treatment, due to a deeper understanding of its effects and a more robust investigation based on the evidence. All published results indicate a decrease in the total treatment time.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.