Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31636855›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2019

The influence of intra-alveolar application of honey versus Chlorhexidine rinse on the incidence of Alveolar Osteitis following molar teeth extraction. A randomized clinical parallel trial.

Nedal Abu-Mostafa, Saja Al-Daghamin, Asma Al-Anazi, Nesreen Al-Jumaah, Amenah Alnesafi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06456060 (Exploring the Efficacy of Pure Honey Dressing in Contrast to Alvogyl in the Resolution of Dry Socket), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06456060 phase1unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Exploring the Efficacy of Pure Honey Dressing in Contrast to Alvogyl in the Resolution of Dry Socket: A Comparative Analysis

TypeinterventionalSponsorWatim Medical & Dental CollegeRan2024 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsDry SocketArmsAlvogyl, Honey
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Effect ofFrontiers in dentistry · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Bee wax and honey-a primer for OMFS.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nedal Abu-MostafaAssistant Professor in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Science Department, Riyadh Elm University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Saja Al-DaghaminDental Interns, Riyadh Elm University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Asma Al-AnaziDental Interns, Riyadh Elm University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Nesreen Al-JumaahDental Interns, Riyadh Elm University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Amenah AlnesafiDental Interns, Riyadh Elm University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Riyadh Elm University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlveolar Osteitis (AO) is a complication occurs on the post-extraction days that includes pain and disintegrated blood clot. Chlorhexidine (CHX) rinse after extraction is an effective method for decreasing the incidence of AO. Honey has natural antibacterial properties and effectiveness when it is used as a dressing on burns and wounds. However, the effect of intraoral honey dressings on healing is still not adequately studied. This study aimed to compare pain and AO after extraction of a molar tooth in a group of patients who received the intra-alveolar application of Manuka Honey post-operatively with another group who used 0.2% CHX rinse. MATERIAL AND

methodsA randomized clinical trial of parallel groups was carried out on 100 patients who had a single molar tooth extraction. They were randomly divided into two groups. Group1 (G1) used 0.2 % CHX twice daily for 7 days. In Group2 (G2), Manuka Honey applied topically by a cotton swab into the socket directly after extraction and on Day3. Re-evaluation, including pain assessment, empty socket, and halitosis was done on day 3 and day 7.

resultsG1 included 43 patients and G2 included 57 patients. Higher grades of pain, more empty sockets, and halitosis were found in G2 than in G1 on day3 and day7 without significant differences. Four cases of AO were found in G1 (9.3%) and 7 cases in G2 (12.3%), without significant difference between the two groups according to Chi-squared tests (

conclusionsThe application of Manuka honey in the extraction socket directly after extraction and on day 3 has been found to be insignificantly less efficient in the prevention of AO than CHX rinse twice daily for seven days. However, honey is promising as natural dressing material and further studies are recommended.

Identifiers

PMID31636855
PMCPMC6797456
OpenAlexW2975270258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.