Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31636715›Full record

ArticleGut pathogens2019

First complete genome sequence and comparative analysis of

Laura Uelze, Maria Borowiak, Carlus Deneke, Cécile Jacobs, István Szabó, Simon H Tausch, Burkhard Malorny

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Gut pathogens, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genomic Features ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  2. Comparative genomics ofMicrobial genomics · 2021
    Article
  3. Complete Genome Sequence of Salmonella enterica subsp.Microbiology resource announcements · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura Uelze1Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung (BfR), Max-Dohrn-Str. 8-10, 10589 Berlin, Germany.
Maria Borowiak1Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung (BfR), Max-Dohrn-Str. 8-10, 10589 Berlin, Germany.
Carlus Deneke1Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung (BfR), Max-Dohrn-Str. 8-10, 10589 Berlin, Germany.
Cécile JacobsLandeslabor Schleswig-Holstein, Max-Eyth-Straße 5, 24537 Neumünster, Germany.
István Szabó1Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung (BfR), Max-Dohrn-Str. 8-10, 10589 Berlin, Germany.
Simon H Tausch1Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung (BfR), Max-Dohrn-Str. 8-10, 10589 Berlin, Germany.
Burkhard Malorny1Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung (BfR), Max-Dohrn-Str. 8-10, 10589 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3363-8225
Federal Institute for Risk Assessment · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe

resultsWe utilized Nanopore and Illumina sequencing technologies to generate a de novo assembly of the 4.88-Mbp complete genome sequence of the SASd strain 16-SA00356, isolated from the organs of a deceased sheep in 2016. We annotated and analyzed the genome sequence with the aim to gain a deeper understanding of the genome characteristics associated with its pathogenicity and host adaptation to sheep. Overall, we found a number of interesting genomic features such as several prophage regions, a VirB4/D4 plasmid and novel genomic islands. By comparing the genome of 16-SA00356 to other

conclusionsWith this sequence, we provide the first complete and closed genome sequence of a SASd strain. With this study, we provide an important basis for an understanding of the genetic mechanism that underlie pathogenicity and host adaptation of SASd to sheep.

Indexed as

Host-adaptationPseudogenesSalmonella enterica subsp. diarizonaeSheep

Identifiers

PMID31636715
PMCPMC6791114
OpenAlexW2980594982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.