Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31636518›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied crystallography2019

3D printed droplet generation devices for serial femtosecond crystallography enabled by surface coating.

Austin Echelmeier, Daihyun Kim, Jorvani Cruz Villarreal, Jesse Coe, Sebastian Quintana, Gerrit Brehm, Ana Egatz-Gomez, Reza Nazari, Raymond G Sierra, Jason E Koglin and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied crystallography, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Serial femtosecond crystallography.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Dynamic Structural Biology Experiments at XFEL or Synchrotron Sources.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. High-throughput in situ experimental phasing.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Austin EchelmeierSchool of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
Daihyun KimSchool of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
Jorvani Cruz VillarrealSchool of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6762-7348
Jesse CoeSchool of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
Sebastian QuintanaSchool of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
Gerrit BrehmInstitute for X-ray Physics, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Ana Egatz-GomezSchool of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6080-943X
Reza NazariCenter for Applied Structural Discovery, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
Raymond G SierraLinac Coherent Light Source, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, 2575 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA.
Jason E KoglinLinac Coherent Light Source, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, 2575 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6811-6083
Alexander BatyukLinac Coherent Light Source, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, 2575 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA.
Mark S HunterLinac Coherent Light Source, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, 2575 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA.
Sébastien BoutetLinac Coherent Light Source, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, 2575 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park, California 94025, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3928-1244
Nadia ZatsepinCenter for Applied Structural Discovery, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1757-0205
Richard A KirianCenter for Applied Structural Discovery, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7197-3086
Thomas D GrantHauptman-Woodward Institute, Department of Structural Biology, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, SUNY University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8583-3700
Petra FrommeSchool of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
Alexandra RosSchool of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
Arizona State University · USSLAC National Accelerator Laboratory · USHauptman-Woodward Medical Research Institute · USUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

Femtosecond nano-crystallography of membrane proteinsR01GM095583 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI FROMME, PETRA · 2010 to 2023
$4.3M
3D NanoprinterS10OD021816 · OD · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI SPENCE, JOHN CHARLES · 2016 to 2016
$659k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM095583NIH HHS S10 OD021816
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of surface wetting properties and their impact on the performance of 3D printed microfluidic droplet generation devices for serial femtosecond crystallography (SFX) are reported. SFX is a novel crystallography method enabling structure determination of proteins at room temperature with atomic resolution using X-ray free-electron lasers (XFELs). In SFX, protein crystals in their mother liquor are delivered and intersected with a pulsed X-ray beam using a liquid jet injector. Owing to the pulsed nature of the X-ray beam, liquid jets tend to waste the vast majority of injected crystals, which this work aims to overcome with the delivery of aqueous protein crystal suspension droplets segmented by an oil phase. For this purpose, 3D printed droplet generators that can be easily customized for a variety of XFEL measurements have been developed. The surface properties, in particular the wetting properties of the resist materials compatible with the employed two-photon printing technology, have so far not been characterized extensively, but are crucial for stable droplet generation. This work investigates experimentally the effectiveness and the long-term stability of three different surface treatments on photoresist films and glass as models for our 3D printed droplet generator and the fused silica capillaries employed in the other fluidic components of an SFX experiment. Finally, the droplet generation performance of an assembly consisting of the 3D printed device and fused silica capillaries is examined. Stable and reproducible droplet generation was achieved with a fluorinated surface coating which also allowed for robust downstream droplet delivery. Experimental XFEL diffraction data of crystals formed from the large membrane protein complex photosystem I demonstrate the full compatibility of the new injection method with very fragile membrane protein crystals and show that successful droplet generation of crystal-laden aqueous droplets intersected by an oil phase correlates with increased crystal hit rates.

Indexed as

droplet generationinjectionmicrofluidic devicesserial crystallography

Identifiers

PMID31636518
PMCPMC6782075
OpenAlexW2970677196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.