ArticleScientific reports2019
Multi-peptide ELISAs overcome cross-reactivity and inadequate sensitivity of conventional Chlamydia pneumoniae serology.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- B-cell peptide epitopes as diagnostic targets for Q fever in sheep.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Serum IgG1 and IgG3 Antibody Responses to Chlamydia trachomatis Pgp3 and Hsp60 in Tubal Factor Infertility.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Evaluation of anNarra J · 2025Article
- Antibodies from chlamydia-infected individuals facilitate phagocytosis via Fc receptors.Infection and immunity · 2024Article
- Challenges in Chlamydial Serology: Insights from a Belgian and a Dutch Population Cohort.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Proof of concept for multiplex detection of antibodies against Chlamydia species in chicken serum using a bead-based suspension array with peptides as antigens.Veterinary research · 2023Article
- A Promising Tool in Serological Diagnosis: Current Research Progress of Antigenic Epitopes in Infectious Diseases.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Outcomes of Antibiotics in Adults with "Difficult to Treat" Asthma or the Overlap Syndrome.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cross-reactivity of classical chlamydial antigens compromises Chlamydia (C.) pneumoniae serology. By testing with 185 human antisera, we expanded 18 previously discovered C. pneumoniae-specific B-cell epitopes to 48 peptide antigens from 12 C. pneumoniae immunodominant proteins. For specific detection of antibodies against C. pneumoniae, we developed novel ELISAs with strongly reactive individual peptide antigens and mixtures of these peptides. By comparison to a composite reference standard (CRS) for anti-C. pneumoniae antibody status of human sera, the top-performing CpnMixF12 peptide assay showed 91% sensitivity at 95% specificity, significantly higher than 4 commercial anti-C. pneumoniae IgG ELISAs (36-12% sensitivity at 95% specificity). Human C. pneumoniae (Cpn) and C. trachomatis (Ctr) seroreactivity was 54% biased towards co-positivity in commercial Cpn and Ctr ELISAs, but unbiased in Cpn and Ctr peptide antibody assays, suggesting severe cross-reactivity of commercial ELISAs. Using hyperimmune mouse sera against each of 11 Chlamydia spp., we confirm that commercial Cpn and Ctr ELISA antigens are cross-reactive among all Chlamydia spp., but Cpn and Ctr peptide antigens react only with antisera against the cognate chlamydial species. With simultaneously high specificity and sensitivity, and convenient use for non-specialized laboratories, these ELISAs have the potential to improve serodiagnosis of C. pneumoniae infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.