Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31636242›Full record

Trial reportKorean journal of anesthesiology2020

Neuromuscular blockade reversal with sugammadex versus pyridostigmine/glycopyrrolate in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized trial of effects on postoperative gastrointestinal motility.

Jihyun An, Heeyun Noh, Eunju Kim, Jihyang Lee, Kyeongyoon Woo, Hyunkyum Kim

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Korean journal of anesthesiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jihyun AnDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Daegu Fatima Hospital, Daegu, Korea.
Heeyun NohDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Daegu Fatima Hospital, Daegu, Korea.
Eunju KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Daegu Fatima Hospital, Daegu, Korea.
Jihyang LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Daegu Fatima Hospital, Daegu, Korea.
Kyeongyoon WooDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Daegu Fatima Hospital, Daegu, Korea.
Hyunkyum KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Daegu Fatima Hospital, Daegu, Korea.
Daegu Fatima Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcetylcholinesterase inhibitors (e.g., pyridostigmine bromide) are used for neuromuscular blockade (NMB) reversal in patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia (GA). Concurrent use of anticholinergic agents (e.g., glycopyrrolate) decreases cholinergic side effects but can impede bowel movements. Sugammadex has no cholinergic effects; its use modifies recovery of gastrointestinal (GI) motility following laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared to pyridostigmine/glycopyrrolate. This study evaluated the contribution of sugammadex to the recovery of GI motility compared with pyridostigmine and glycopyrrolate.

methodsWe conducted a prospective study of patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were randomly allocated to the experimental group (sugammadex, Group S) or control group (pyridostigmine-glycopyrrolate, Group P). After anesthesia (propofol and rocuronium, and 2% sevoflurane), recovery was induced by injection of sugammadex or a pyridostigmine-glycopyrrolate mixture. As a primary outcome, patients recorded the time of their first passage of flatus ('gas-out time') and defecation. The secondary outcome was stool types.

resultsOne-hundred and two patients participated (Group S, 49; Group P, 53). Mean time from injection of NMB reversal agents to gas-out time was 15.03 (6.36-20.25) h in Group S and 20.85 (16.34-25.86) h in Group P (P = 0.001). Inter-group differences were significant. Time until the first defecation as well as types of stools was not significantly different.

conclusionsSugammadex after laparoscopic cholecystectomy under GA resulted in an earlier first postoperative passage of flatus compared with the use of a mixture of pyridostigmine and glycopyrrolate. These findings suggest that the use of sugammadex has positive effects on the recovery of GI motility.

Indexed as

AdultCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicCholinesterase InhibitorsDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGastrointestinal MotilityGlycopyrrolateHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscarinic AntagonistsNeuromuscular BlockadeNeuromuscular Nondepolarizing AgentsPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesPyridostigmine BromideCholinesterase InhibitorsGlycopyrrolateMuscarinic AntagonistsNeuromuscular Nondepolarizing AgentsPyridostigmine BromideSugammadexCholinergic antagonistsDefecationFlatulenceGastrointestinal motilityGlycopyrrolatePyridostigmine bromideSugammadex

Identifiers

PMID31636242
PMCPMC7113156
OpenAlexW2982283665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.