Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31636186›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Middle Paleolithic complex technology and a Neandertal tar-backed tool from the Dutch North Sea.

Marcel J L Th Niekus, Paul R B Kozowyk, Geeske H J Langejans, Dominique Ngan-Tillard, Henk van Keulen, Johannes van der Plicht, Kim M Cohen, Willy van Wingerden, Bertil van Os, Bjørn I Smit and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Archaeological evidence for thinking about possibilities in hominin evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Marcel J L Th NiekusStichting STONE/Foundation for Stone Age Research in The Netherlands, 9741 KW Groningen, The Netherlands; marcelniekus@gmail.com p.r.b.kozowyk@arch.leidenuniv.nl g.langejans@tudelft.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-1082-8058
Paul R B KozowykFaculty of Archeology, Leiden University, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands; marcelniekus@gmail.com p.r.b.kozowyk@arch.leidenuniv.nl g.langejans@tudelft.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-9924-347X
Geeske H J LangejansFaculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands; marcelniekus@gmail.com p.r.b.kozowyk@arch.leidenuniv.nl g.langejans@tudelft.nl.
Dominique Ngan-TillardFaculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7809-8077
Henk van KeulenCultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands, 1071 ZC Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Johannes van der PlichtFaculty of Science and Engineering, University of Groningen, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4298-7037
Kim M CohenFaculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, 3584 CB Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0095-3990
Willy van WingerdenPrivate address, 2675 WC Honselersdijk, The Netherlands.
Bertil van OsCultural Heritage Agency of The Netherlands, 3811 MG Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
Bjørn I SmitCultural Heritage Agency of The Netherlands, 3811 MG Amersfoort, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3641-5756
Luc W S W AmkreutzFaculty of Archeology, Leiden University, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4664-5552
Lykke JohansenArcheological Drawings and Analyses, 9751 SC Haren, The Netherlands.
Annemieke VerbaasFaculty of Archeology, Leiden University, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Gerrit L DusseldorpFaculty of Archeology, Leiden University, 2333 CC Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6147-710X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report the discovery of a 50,000-y-old birch tar-hafted flint tool found off the present-day coastline of The Netherlands. The production of adhesives and multicomponent tools is considered complex technology and has a prominent place in discussions about the evolution of human behavior. This find provides evidence on the technological capabilities of Neandertals and illuminates the currently debated conditions under which these technologies could be maintained.

Indexed as

ArchaeologyTool Use BehaviorAdhesivesAnimalsHumansNeanderthalsNetherlandsTechnologyX-Ray MicrotomographyAdhesivesadhesivebirch bark tarhaftingLate Pleistocenerisk mitigation

Identifiers

PMID31636186
PMCPMC6825292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.