Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31636178›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Visual fixation patterns during economic choice reflect covert valuation processes that emerge with learning.

Sean E Cavanagh, W M Nishantha Malalasekera, Bruno Miranda, Laurence T Hunt, Steven W Kennerley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sean E CavanaghDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, University College London, WC1N 3BG London, United Kingdom; sean.cavanagh.12@ucl.ac.uk s.kennerley@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-9275-2725
W M Nishantha MalalasekeraDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, University College London, WC1N 3BG London, United Kingdom.
Bruno MirandaDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, University College London, WC1N 3BG London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4660-6051
Laurence T HuntDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, University College London, WC1N 3BG London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8393-8533
Steven W KennerleyDepartment of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, University College London, WC1N 3BG London, United Kingdom; sean.cavanagh.12@ucl.ac.uk s.kennerley@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5696-7507

Funding

Department of HealthWellcome Trust 096689/Z/11/ZWellcome Trust 098830/Z/12/ZWellcome Trust 208789/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual fixations play a vital role in decision making. Recent studies have demonstrated that the longer subjects fixate an option, the more likely they are to choose it. However, the role of evaluating stimuli covertly (i.e., without fixating them), and how covert evaluations determine where to subsequently fixate, remains relatively unexplored. Here, we trained monkeys to perform a decision-making task where they made binary choices between reward-predictive stimuli which were well-learned ("overtrained"), recently learned ("novel"), or a combination of both ("mixed"). Subjects were free to saccade around the screen and make a choice (via joystick response) at any time. Subjects rarely fixated both options, yet choice behavior was better explained by assuming the values of both stimuli governed choices. The first fixation latency was fast (∼150 ms) but, surprisingly, its direction was value-driven. This suggests covert evaluation of stimulus values prior to first saccade. This was particularly evident for overtrained stimuli. For novel stimuli, first fixations became increasingly value-driven throughout a behavioral session. However, this improvement lagged behind learning of accurate economic choices, suggesting separate processes governed their learning. Finally, mixed trials revealed a strong bias toward fixating the novel stimulus first but no bias toward choosing it. Our results suggest that the primate brain contains fast covert evaluation mechanisms for guiding fixations toward highly valuable and novel information. By employing such covert mechanisms, fixation behavior becomes dissociable from the value comparison processes that drive final choice. This implies that primates use separable decision systems for value-guided fixations and value-guided choice.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorFixation, OcularLearningAnimalsMacacaPhotic Stimulationattentiondecision makinglearningnovelty bonusvalue

Identifiers

PMID31636178
PMCPMC6842638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.