ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019
GenBank is a reliable resource for 21st century biodiversity research.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed.
- pr2-Wormifier: A Bioinformatics Pipeline to Create Custom Reference Databases for Improved Metabarcoding of Marine Protists.Molecular ecology resources · 2026Article
- A biosynthetic survey of hypocrealean biocontrol fungi.Nature chemical biology · 2026Article
- Spatio-temporal dynamics of Hendra virus in Australia reveal stable maintenance of diverse viral clades among Pteropus bats.Nature microbiology · 2026Article
- RePo index: a multidimensional framework to quantify genetic resilience in data-limited amphibian faunas.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Unlocking natural history collections to improve eDNA reference databases and biodiversity monitoring.Bioscience · 2025Article
- Establishing DNA-Based Strategies for Soil Biodiversity Assessment: Insights From Carabid Beetles.Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- eDNA surveys substantially expand known geographic and ecological niche boundaries of marine fishes.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- A taxonomically reliable DNA barcode reference library for North Sea macrobenthos.Scientific data · 2025Article
- In Vouchers We (Hope to) Trust: Unveiling Hidden Errors in GenBank's Tetrapod Taxonomic Foundations.Molecular ecology · 2025Review
- DNA barcoding for elasmobranch diversity assessment in Thailand: Its advantages and limitations.PloS one · 2025Article
- Evaluation of DNA barcoding reference databases for marine species in the western and central Pacific Ocean.PeerJ · 2025Article
- Biodiversity Patterns and DNA Barcode Gap Analysis of COI in Coastal Lagoons of Albania.Biology · 2024Article
- The complete annotated plastome sequences of six genera in the tropical woody Polygonaceae.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- rCRUX: A Rapid and Versatile Tool for Generating Metabarcoding Reference libraries in R.Environmental DNA (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Article
- In silico assessment of 18S rDNA metabarcoding markers for the characterization of nematode communities.PloS one · 2024Article
- Robust evidence for bats as reservoir hosts is lacking in most African virus studies: a review and call to optimize sampling and conserve bats.Biology letters · 2023Review
- An automated model annotation system (AMAS) for SBML models.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- An Authentication Survey on Retail Seafood Products Sold on the Bulgarian Market Underlines the Need for Upgrading the Traceability System.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Nomenclature: Herbal Taxonomy in the Global Commerce of Botanicals.Progress in the chemistry of organic natural products · 2023Article
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional methods of characterizing biodiversity are increasingly being supplemented and replaced by approaches based on DNA sequencing alone. These approaches commonly involve extraction and high-throughput sequencing of bulk samples from biologically complex communities or samples of environmental DNA (eDNA). In such cases, vouchers for individual organisms are rarely obtained, often unidentifiable, or unavailable. Thus, identifying these sequences typically relies on comparisons with sequences from genetic databases, particularly GenBank. While concerns have been raised about biases and inaccuracies in laboratory and analytical methods, comparatively little attention has been paid to the taxonomic reliability of GenBank itself. Here we analyze the metazoan mitochondrial sequences of GenBank using a combination of distance-based clustering and phylogenetic analysis. Because of their comparatively rapid evolutionary rates and consequent high taxonomic resolution, mitochondrial sequences represent an invaluable resource for the detection of the many small and often undescribed organisms that represent the bulk of animal diversity. We show that metazoan identifications in GenBank are surprisingly accurate, even at low taxonomic levels (likely <1% error rate at the genus level). This stands in contrast to previously voiced concerns based on limited analyses of particular groups and the fact that individual researchers currently submit annotated sequences to GenBank without significant external taxonomic validation. Our encouraging results suggest that the rapid uptake of DNA-based approaches is supported by a bioinformatic infrastructure capable of assessing both the losses to biodiversity caused by global change and the effectiveness of conservation efforts aimed at slowing or reversing these losses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.