Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31636175›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

GenBank is a reliable resource for 21st century biodiversity research.

Matthieu Leray, Nancy Knowlton, Shian-Lei Ho, Bryan N Nguyen, Ryuji J Machida

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. An automated model annotation system (AMAS) for SBML models.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Nomenclature: Herbal Taxonomy in the Global Commerce of Botanicals.Progress in the chemistry of organic natural products · 2023
    Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthieu LeraySmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Smithsonian Institution, Panama City, 0843-03092, Republic of Panama.ORCID 0000-0002-7327-1878
Nancy KnowltonNational Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560; knowlton@si.edu ryujimachida@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4062-5502
Shian-Lei HoBiodiversity Research Centre, Academia Sinica, 115-29 Taipei, Taiwan.
Bryan N NguyenNational Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560.ORCID 0000-0001-7791-4693
Ryuji J MachidaBiodiversity Research Centre, Academia Sinica, 115-29 Taipei, Taiwan; knowlton@si.edu ryujimachida@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1687-4709

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional methods of characterizing biodiversity are increasingly being supplemented and replaced by approaches based on DNA sequencing alone. These approaches commonly involve extraction and high-throughput sequencing of bulk samples from biologically complex communities or samples of environmental DNA (eDNA). In such cases, vouchers for individual organisms are rarely obtained, often unidentifiable, or unavailable. Thus, identifying these sequences typically relies on comparisons with sequences from genetic databases, particularly GenBank. While concerns have been raised about biases and inaccuracies in laboratory and analytical methods, comparatively little attention has been paid to the taxonomic reliability of GenBank itself. Here we analyze the metazoan mitochondrial sequences of GenBank using a combination of distance-based clustering and phylogenetic analysis. Because of their comparatively rapid evolutionary rates and consequent high taxonomic resolution, mitochondrial sequences represent an invaluable resource for the detection of the many small and often undescribed organisms that represent the bulk of animal diversity. We show that metazoan identifications in GenBank are surprisingly accurate, even at low taxonomic levels (likely <1% error rate at the genus level). This stands in contrast to previously voiced concerns based on limited analyses of particular groups and the fact that individual researchers currently submit annotated sequences to GenBank without significant external taxonomic validation. Our encouraging results suggest that the rapid uptake of DNA-based approaches is supported by a bioinformatic infrastructure capable of assessing both the losses to biodiversity caused by global change and the effectiveness of conservation efforts aimed at slowing or reversing these losses.

Indexed as

BiodiversityDatabases, GeneticResearchAnimalsDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicHistory, 21st Centuryenvironmental DNAmetabarcodingtaxonomic assignments

Identifiers

PMID31636175
PMCPMC6842603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.