Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31636006›Full record

ReviewEpilepsy & behavior : E&B2021

Promise of extracellular vesicles for diagnosis and treatment of epilepsy.

Dinesh Upadhya, Ashok K Shetty

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Epilepsy & behavior : E&B, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Epilepsy grand challenge 2025.Frontiers in neurology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Molecular Biomarkers of Neuronal Injury in Epilepsy Shared with Neurodegenerative Diseases.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dinesh UpadhyaCentre for Molecular Neurosciences, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Ashok K ShettyInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Department of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Texas A&M University College of Medicine, College Station, TX, USA. Electronic address: shetty@medicine.tamhsc.edu.
Kasturba Medical College, Manipal · INTexas A&M University · US

Funding

Mesenchymal Stem Cell Derived Extracellular Vesicles for Traumatic Brain InjuryR01NS106907 · NINDS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCE CTR · PI ASHOK K SHETTY · 2018 to 2026
$4.0M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS106907
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) released from cells play vital roles in intercellular communication. Moreover, EVs released from stem cells have therapeutic properties. This review confers the potential of brain-derived EVs in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and the serum as sources of epilepsy-related biomarkers, and the promise of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-derived EVs for easing status epilepticus (SE)-induced adverse changes in the brain. Extracellular vesicles shed from neurons and glia in the brain can also be found in the circulating blood as EVs cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Evaluation of neuron and/or glia-derived EVs in the blood of patients who have epilepsy could help in identifying specific biomarkers for distinct types of epilepsies. Such a liquid biopsy approach is also amenable for repeated analysis in clinical trials for comprehending treatment efficacy, disease progression, and mechanisms of therapeutic interventions. Extracellular vesicle biomarker studies in animal prototypes of epilepsy, in addition, could help in identifying specific micro ribonucleic acid (miRNAs) contributing to epileptogenesis, seizures, or cognitive dysfunction in different types of epilepsy. Furthermore, intranasal (IN) administration of MSC-derived EVs after SE has shown efficacy for restraining SE-induced neuroinflammation, aberrant neurogenesis, and cognitive dysfunction in an animal prototype. Clinical translation of EV therapy as an adjunct to antiepileptic drugs appears attractive to counteract the progression of SE-induced epileptogenic changes, as the risk for thrombosis or tumor is minimal with nanosized EVs. Also, EVs can be engineered to deliver specific miRNAs, proteins, or antiepileptic drugs to the brain since they incorporate into neurons and glia throughout the brain after IN administration. This article is part of the Special Issue "NEWroscience 2018".

Indexed as

EpilepsyExtracellular VesiclesStatus EpilepticusAnimalsBrainDisease Models, AnimalHumansCognitive dysfunctionExtracellular vesiclesMemoryMesenchymal stem cellsSeizuresTemporal lobe epilepsy

Identifiers

PMID31636006
PMCPMC7165061
OpenAlexW2981254749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.