Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31635988›Full record

ArticleJournal of optometry

The effects of two longpass filters on visual performance.

Federica Cozza, Matteo Monzio Compagnoni, Chiara Airoldi, Chiara Braga, Gabriele Nigrotti, Natalia Vlasak, Silvano Larcher, Fabrizio Zeri, Silvia Tavazzi

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of optometry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Blue-Light Filters in Eye Care: A State-of-the-Art Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Federica CozzaDepartment of Materials Science, University of Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy; Research Centre in Optics and Optometry (COMiB), University of Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Matteo Monzio CompagnoniDepartment of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Chiara AiroldiDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.
Chiara BragaResearch Centre in Optics and Optometry (COMiB), University of Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Gabriele NigrottiResearch Centre in Optics and Optometry (COMiB), University of Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Natalia VlasakHoya Vision Care, Uithoorn, The Netherlands.
Silvano LarcherHoya Lens Italy, Milan, Italy.
Fabrizio ZeriDepartment of Materials Science, University of Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy; Research Centre in Optics and Optometry (COMiB), University of Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy; Ophthalmic Research Group. School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK. Electronic address: fabrizio.zeri@unimib.it.
Silvia TavazziDepartment of Materials Science, University of Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy; Research Centre in Optics and Optometry (COMiB), University of Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
University of Milano-Bicocca · ITUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study compared visual performance and optical properties of three filters.

methodTwo groups of twenty adults were recruited: wearers of progressive addition lenses (PAL, 46-73 years) and wearers of single vision lenses (SVL, 26-55 years). Three spectacle filters (Hoya, Japan) were compared: clear control, Standard Drive (STD), and Professional Drive (PRO) lenses. Optical transmittance was measured by a Jasco V-650 spectrophotometer. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was measured in photopic (BCVAphotopic) and mesopic (BCVAmesopic) conditions and under glare (BCVAglare). Photopic contrast sensitivity (CS) was also measured.

resultsThe three longpass filters show cutoff at 426±2nm (STD/PRO) and 405±2nm (clear lens). BCVAglare improved with Drive filters compared to the clear one (p<0.05) from 0.03 to -0.02 (STD) and to -0.01 (PRO) for PAL and from -0.08 to -0.12 (STD and PRO) for SVL. For PAL, BCVAmesopic improved from 0.15 to 0.12 (STD, p<0.05) and 0.13 (PRO), while no substantial difference was observed for SVL. CS showed some improvements with Drive lenses at some angular frequencies between 6 and 18 cycles/deg, mainly for the PAL group. No BCVAphotopic differences were found. After testing all filters, each for two weeks, 79% (PAL) and 60% (SVL) of participants preferred Drive lenses.

conclusionsDrive lenses are found to maintain or improve some visual functions compared to the clear lens. The improvement of mesopic visual acuity, visual acuity under glare, and contrast sensitivity is mainly attributed to the reduction of intraocular light scattering as a consequence of the total light attenuation in the spectral range below the cutoff.

Indexed as

EyeglassesAdultAgedContrast SensitivityFemaleFiltrationHumansMaleMesopic VisionMiddle AgedOptics and PhotonicsVisual AcuityAgudeza visualContrast sensitivityDeslumbramientoGlareLongpassMacular pigmentPigmento macularSensibilidad de contrasteVisual acuity

Identifiers

PMID31635988
PMCPMC7182782
OpenAlexW2981094794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.