Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31635375›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Augmenting Clinical Outcome Measures of Gait and Balance with a Single Inertial Sensor in Age-Ranged Healthy Adults.

Megan K O'Brien, Marco D Hidalgo-Araya, Chaithanya K Mummidisetty, Heike Vallery, Roozbeh Ghaffari, John A Rogers, Richard Lieber, Arun Jayaraman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Using an Accelerometer-Based Step Counter in Post-Stroke Patients: Validation of a Low-Cost Tool.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Megan K O'BrienMax Nader Lab for Rehabilitation Technologies and Outcomes Research, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL 60611, USA. mobrien02@sralab.org.
Marco D Hidalgo-ArayaMax Nader Lab for Rehabilitation Technologies and Outcomes Research, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL 60611, USA. marhiar@gmail.com.
Chaithanya K MummidisettyMax Nader Lab for Rehabilitation Technologies and Outcomes Research, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL 60611, USA. cmummidise@sralab.org.
Heike ValleryDepartment of BioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628CD Delft, The Netherlands. H.Vallery@tudelft.nl.
Roozbeh GhaffariCenter for Bio-Integrated Electronics, Departments of Materials Science and Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA. rooz@northwestern.edu.
John A RogersCenter for Bio-Integrated Electronics, Departments of Materials Science and Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA. jrogers@northwestern.edu.
Richard LieberShirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL 60611, USA. rlieber@sralab.org.
Arun JayaramanMax Nader Lab for Rehabilitation Technologies and Outcomes Research, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL 60611, USA. ajayaraman@sralab.org.

Funding

Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute (NUCATS)UL1TR001422 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI D'AQUILA, RICHARD · 2015 to 2023
$56.8M
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY AND REHABILITATION OF NEURAL DYSFUNCTIONT32HD007418 · NICHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Levi John Hargrove · 1992 to 2026
$6.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001422NIH HHS T32HD007418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gait and balance impairments are linked with reduced mobility and increased risk of falling. Wearable sensing technologies, such as inertial measurement units (IMUs), may augment clinical assessments by providing continuous, high-resolution data. This study tested and validated the utility of a single IMU to quantify gait and balance features during routine clinical outcome tests, and evaluated changes in sensor-derived measurements with age, sex, height, and weight. Age-ranged, healthy individuals (N = 49, 20-70 years) wore a lower back IMU during the 10 m walk test (10MWT), Timed Up and Go (TUG), and Berg Balance Scale (BBS). Spatiotemporal gait parameters computed from the sensor data were validated against gold standard measures, demonstrating excellent agreement for stance time, step time, gait velocity, and step count (intraclass correlation (ICC) > 0.90). There was good agreement for swing time (ICC = 0.78) and moderate agreement for step length (ICC = 0.68). A total of 184 features were calculated from the acceleration and angular velocity signals across these tests, 36 of which had significant correlations with age. This approach was also demonstrated for an individual with stroke, providing higher resolution information about balance, gait, and mobility than the clinical test scores alone. Leveraging mobility data from wireless, wearable sensors can help clinicians and patients more objectively pinpoint impairments, track progression, and set personalized goals during and after rehabilitation.

Indexed as

GaitPostural BalanceAdultAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareStrokeStroke RehabilitationWearable Electronic DevicesYoung AdultBerg Balance Scalefall riskgait eventsgait impairmentpostural swayrehabilitationTen-Meter Walk TestTimed Up and Gowearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID31635375
PMCPMC6832985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.