Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31635342›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2019

Radial Artery Access for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions: Contemporary Insights and Novel Approaches.

Renato Francesco Maria Scalise, Armando Mariano Salito, Alberto Polimeni, Victoria Garcia-Ruiz, Vittorio Virga, Pierpaolo Frigione, Giuseppe Andò, Carlo Tumscitz, Francesco Costa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Renato Francesco Maria ScaliseDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Policlinic "G. Martino", University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy. rfm.scalise@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9149-0217
Armando Mariano SalitoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Policlinic "G. Martino", University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy. armandosalito@gmail.com.
Alberto PolimeniDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy. polimeni@unicz.it.ORCID 0000-0002-9166-3031
Victoria Garcia-RuizUGC del Corazón, Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, 29010 Málaga, Spain. mavigaru@gmail.com.
Vittorio VirgaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Policlinic "G. Martino", University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy. vittorio.virga@yahoo.it.
Pierpaolo FrigioneDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Policlinic "G. Martino", University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy. pfrigione@homail.com.
Giuseppe AndòDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Policlinic "G. Martino", University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy. gando@unime.it.ORCID 0000-0001-5552-6382
Carlo TumscitzDepartment of Cardiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Ferrara, Via Aldo Moro, 8, Cona, 30010 Ferrara, Italy. Tumscitz@gmail.com.
Francesco CostaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Policlinic "G. Martino", University of Messina, 98100 Messina, Italy. dottfrancescocosta@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3097-2834

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since its introduction, the transradial access for percutaneous cardiovascular procedures has been associated with several advantages as compared to transfemoral approach, and has become the default for coronary angiography and intervention. In the last 30 years, a robust amount of evidence on the transradial approach has been mounted, promoting its diffusion worldwide. This article provides a comprehensive review of radial artery access for percutaneous cardiovascular interventions, including the evidence from clinical trials of transradial vs. transfemoral approach, technical considerations, access-site complications and limitations, alternative forearm accesses (e.g., ulnar and distal radial artery), and ultimately the use of the radial approach for structural interventions.

Indexed as

aortic valvuloplastydistal radialpercutaneous coronary interventionradialsnuffboxulnar

Identifiers

PMID31635342
PMCPMC6833028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.