Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31635296›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Natural Products in Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Great Promise but an Ethical Challenge.

Marco Di Paolo, Luigi Papi, Federica Gori, Emanuela Turillazzi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Research on Alzheimer's Disease (AD) Involving the Use ofCentral nervous system agents in medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
  12. Neuroprotective Effect of Naturally Occurring Flavonoids.Central nervous system agents in medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
  13. Role of Medicinal Plants in the Management of Multiple Sclerosis.Current pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  14. Protective Effect of Arzanol against HInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marco Di PaoloSection of Legal Medicine, Department of Surgical Pathology, Medical, Molecular and Critical Area, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy. marco.dipaolo@unipi.it.
Luigi PapiSection of Legal Medicine, Department of Surgical Pathology, Medical, Molecular and Critical Area, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy. luigi.papi@unipi.it.
Federica GoriSection of Legal Medicine, Department of Surgical Pathology, Medical, Molecular and Critical Area, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy. gori.federica@virgilio.it.
Emanuela TurillazziSection of Legal Medicine, Department of Surgical Pathology, Medical, Molecular and Critical Area, University of Pisa, 56124 Pisa, Italy. emanuela_turillazzi@inwind.it.ORCID 0000-0002-4067-542X
University of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) represent one of the most important public health problems and concerns, as they are a growing cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide, particularly in the elderly. Despite remarkable breakthroughs in our understanding of NDs, there has been little success in developing effective therapies. The use of natural products may offer great potential opportunities in the prevention and therapy of NDs; however, many clinical concerns have arisen regarding their use, mainly focusing on the lack of scientific support or evidence for their efficacy and patient safety. These clinical uncertainties raise critical questions from a bioethical and legal point of view, as considerations relating to patient decisional autonomy, patient safety, and beneficial or non-beneficial care may need to be addressed. This paper does not intend to advocate for or against the use of natural products, but to analyze the ethical framework of their use, with particular attention paid to the principles of biomedical ethics. In conclusion, the notable message that emerges is that natural products may represent a great promise for the treatment of many NDs, even if many unknown issues regarding the efficacy and safety of many natural products still remain.

Indexed as

Ethics, ClinicalAnimalsBiological ProductsDisease ManagementDisease SusceptibilityHumansNeurodegenerative DiseasesRisk FactorsBiological Productsbeneficenceethicsmedical liabilitynatural productsneurodegenerative diseasesnonmaleficencepatients’ autonomy

Identifiers

PMID31635296
PMCPMC6834164
OpenAlexW2980478463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.