ArticleGenes2019
Comparative Study of Gut Microbiota in Wild and Captive Giant Pandas (
Article in Genes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
75 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 127 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diet, Microbes, and Cancer Across the Tree of Life: a Systematic Review.Current nutrition reports · 2022Pooled it
- Animal gut microbes and microbiomes in the 21st century and beyond.Science China. Life sciences · 2026Review
- Comparative Analysis of Gut Microbiota Among Captive Waterbird Species: Effects of Diet and Environmental Factors.Veterinary medicine and science · 2026Article
- Grass supplementation to a pellet-based diet fails to enrich gut microbiomes with wild-like functions in captive-bred hares.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Seasonal diet shifts alter the gut microbiome and resistome of captive geriatric giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca).BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Characterising the gut microbiome of six Australian marsupials reveals captivity constrains microbiome.Animal microbiome · 2026Article
- Comprehensive catalog of gut microbial genomes in Asian elephants: insights from shotgun metagenomics.Animal microbiome · 2026Article
- Safeguarding a Flagship Species: Integrated Surveillance of Cross-Species Pathogen Transmission in Giant Panda Ecosystems.Ecology and evolution · 2026Review
- Intestinal microbiome gone native: gut microbiome shift and resistome diversity in first homecoming giant panda family.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Differential analysis of gut microbiota between captive and wild forest musk deer (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Dynamics of the gut microbiome and resistome in response to prophylactic antibiotic treatment in post-surgical giant pandas.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Multi-omic profiling reveals distinct gut microbial and metabolic landscapes in golden snub-nosed monkeys under contrasting conservation strategies.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2025Article
- Metagenome-Based Functional Differentiation of Gut Microbiota and Ecological Adaptation Among Geographically Distinct Populations of Przewalski's Gazelle (Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Comprehensive metagenomic analysis of the giant panda's oral microbiome reveals distinct taxonomic and functional characteristics.Animal microbiome · 2025Article
- A Comparison of the Intestinal Fungal Community in Wild and Captive Himalayan Vultures (Polish journal of microbiology · 2025Article
- Adaptive changes in the intestinal microbiota of giant pandas following reintroduction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Metagenome Analysis Reveals Changes in Gut Microbial Antibiotic Resistance Genes and Virulence Factors in Reintroduced Giant Pandas.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Impacts of Captive Domestication and Geographical Divergence on the Gut Microbiome of Endangered Forest Musk Deer.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Reintroduction training is instrumental in restoring the oral microbiota of giant pandas from "captivity" to "wildness".BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Characterization and Optimization of Cellulose-Degrading Bacteria Isolated from Fecal Samples ofMicroorganisms · 2025Article
15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Captive breeding has been used as an effective approach to protecting endangered animals but its effect on the gut microbiome and the conservation status of these species is largely unknown. The giant panda is a flagship species for the conservation of wildlife. With integrated efforts including captive breeding, this species has been recently upgraded from "endangered" to "vulnerable" (IUCN 2016). Since a large proportion (21.8%) of their global population is still captive, it is critical to understand how captivity changes the gut microbiome of these pandas and how such alterations to the microbiome might affect their future fitness and potential impact on the ecosystem after release into the wild. Here, we use 16S rRNA (ribosomal RNA) marker gene sequencing and shotgun metagenomics sequencing to demonstrate that the fecal microbiomes differ substantially between wild and captive giant pandas. Fecal microbiome diversity was significantly lower in captive pandas, as was the diversity of functional genes. Additionally, captive pandas have reduced functional potential for cellulose degradation but enriched metabolic pathways for starch metabolism, indicating that they may not adapt to a wild diet after being released into the wild since a major component of their diet in the wild will be bamboo. Most significantly, we observed a significantly higher level of amylase activity but a lower level of cellulase activity in captive giant panda feces than those of wild giant pandas, shown by an in vitro experimental assay. Furthermore, antibiotic resistance genes and virulence factors, as well as heavy metal tolerance genes were enriched in the microbiomes of captive pandas, which raises a great concern of spreading these genes to other wild animals and ecosystems when they are released into a wild environment. Our results clearly show that captivity has altered the giant panda microbiome, which could have unintended negative consequences on their adaptability and the ecosystem during the reintroduction of giant pandas into the wild.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.