Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31635112›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Working with Institutional Stakeholders: Propositions for Alternative Approaches to Community Engagement.

Jeffrey G Cox, Minwoong Chung, Joseph A Hamm, Adam Zwickle, Shannon M Cruz, James W Dearing

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Themes Across New Directions in Community Engagement.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey G CoxDepartment of Communication Studies, Albion College, 611 East Porter Street, Albion, MI 49224, USA. jgcox@albion.edu.
Minwoong ChungDepartment of Communication, Michigan State University, 404 Wilson Road, East Lansing, MI 48824-1212, USA. chungm12@msu.edu.
Joseph A HammSchool of Criminal Justice, Michigan State University, 665 Auditorium Road, East Lansing, MI 48824-1212, USA. jhamm@msu.edu.
Adam ZwickleSchool of Criminal Justice, Michigan State University, 665 Auditorium Road, East Lansing, MI 48824-1212, USA. zwicklea@msu.edu.
Shannon M CruzDepartment of Communication Arts & Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA. shannon.cruz@psu.edu.
James W DearingDepartment of Communication, Michigan State University, 404 Wilson Road, East Lansing, MI 48824-1212, USA. dearjim@msu.edu.
Michigan State University · USAlbion College · USPennsylvania State University · US

Funding

VOLATILE ORGANIC CONTAMINANTS--QUANTIFYING THEIR MOVEMENT IN THE UNSATURATED ZONEP42ES004911 · NIEHS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Timothy R. Zacharewski · 1989 to 2026
$64.9M
NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES004911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community engagement is a vital aspect of addressing environmental contamination and remediation. In the United States, the Superfund Research Program (SRP) forms groups of academic researchers from the social and physical sciences into Community Engagement Cores (CECs) and Research Translation Cores (RTCs), which focus on various aspects of informing and working with communities during and through the resolution of environmental crises. While this work typically involves engaging directly with members of affected communities, no two situations are the same. In some cases, alternative approaches to community engagement can be more appropriate for community improvement than traditional approaches. In particular, when research teams become involved in contamination crises at a late point in the process, their contributions can be better directed at supporting and reinforcing the work of institutional stakeholders charged with remediating pollution. Relevant factors include issue fatigue among a local population, and contamination that is due to a major employer. Supported by literature and experience, we offer several propositions that we believe lay out conditions that warrant such an approach by academic teams, rather than their direct engagement with unaffiliated individuals in communities.

Indexed as

CommunicationCommunity ParticipationEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationHumansPopulation GroupsResearch PersonnelTranslational Research, BiomedicalUnited Statescommunity engagementcontaminationenvironmental communicationinstitutional stakeholdersremediation

Identifiers

PMID31635112
PMCPMC6844076
OpenAlexW2980663024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.