Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31635037›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

The Development and Validation of the Healthcare Professional Humanization Scale (HUMAS) for Nursing.

María Del Carmen Pérez-Fuentes, Iván Herera-Peco, María Del Mar Molero Jurado, Nieves Fátima Oropesa Ruiz, Diego Ayuso-Murillo, José Jesús Gázquez Linares

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Moral Sensitivity, Empathy and Prosocial Behavior: Implications for Humanization of Nursing Care.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  12. Design and Validation of the Adaptation to Change Questionnaire: New Realities in Times of COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Questionnaire on Perception of Threat from COVID-19.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

María Del Carmen Pérez-FuentesDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain. perezfuentes@ual.es.ORCID 0000-0001-5950-5175
Iván Herera-PecoHealth Sciences Collegue, Alfonso X El Sabio University, 28691 Madrid, Spain. iherrpec@uax.es.
María Del Mar Molero JuradoDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain. mmj130@ual.es.ORCID 0000-0001-9187-1474
Nieves Fátima Oropesa RuizDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Almería, 04120 Almería, Spain. foropesa@ual.es.
Diego Ayuso-MurilloConsejo General de Enfermería, 28023 Madrid, Spain. d.ayuso@consejogeneralenfermeria.org.ORCID 0000-0002-0492-5073
José Jesús Gázquez LinaresDepartment of Psychology, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Providencia 7500000, Chile. jlinares@ual.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe approach and use of the term "humanization" is very much present in healthcare. However, instruments for measuring the concept of the humanization of care are yet to be designed and developed.

objectiveThe main objective of this study was to evaluate and validate the Healthcare Professional Humanization Scale (HUMAS) for nursing professionals.

methodThe sample was made up of 338 adults, who were nurses working at health centers and hospitals, and aged between 22 and 56.

resultsThe results of the analyses confirm that the Healthcare Professional Humanization Scale (HUMAS) has an adequate construct validity and reliability, and defines the humanization of care as a multidimensional construct, made up of five factors: Affection, Self-efficacy, Emotional understanding, Optimistic disposition and Sociability.

conclusionsThe new HUMAS scale may be an easily administered and coded instrument for approaching the humanization of care, not only in research, but also in practice.

Indexed as

AdultEmotional IntelligenceFemaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsMaleMiddle AgedNursesOptimismPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSelf EfficacySurveys and Questionnaireshealthhealthcare personnelhumanizationscalevalidation

Identifiers

PMID31635037
PMCPMC6843922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.