Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31634361›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Robust automated reading of the skin prick test via 3D imaging and parametric surface fitting.

Jesus Pineda, Raul Vargas, Lenny A Romero, Javier Marrugo, Jaime Meneses, Andres G Marrugo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jesus PinedaFacultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Tecnologica de Bolivar, Cartagena, Colombia.
Raul VargasFacultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Tecnologica de Bolivar, Cartagena, Colombia.
Lenny A RomeroFacultad de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad Tecnologica de Bolivar, Cartagena, Colombia.
Javier MarrugoInstituto de Investigaciones Inmunológicas, Universidad De Cartagena, Cartagena, Colombia.
Jaime MenesesGrupo de Óptica y Tratamiento de Señales, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia.
Andres G MarrugoFacultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Tecnologica de Bolivar, Cartagena, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-2413-7645
Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar · COIndustrial University of Santander · COUniversity of Cartagena · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The conventional reading of the skin prick test (SPT) for diagnosing allergies is prone to inter- and intra-observer variations. Drawing the contours of the skin wheals from the SPT and scanning them for computer processing is cumbersome. However, 3D scanning technology promises the best results in terms of accuracy, fast acquisition, and processing. In this work, we present a wide-field 3D imaging system for the 3D reconstruction of the SPT, and we propose an automated method for the measurement of the skin wheals. The automated measurement is based on pyramidal decomposition and parametric 3D surface fitting for estimating the sizes of the wheals directly. We proposed two parametric models for the diameter estimation. Model 1 is based on an inverted Elliptical Paraboloid function, and model 2 on a super-Gaussian function. The accuracy of the 3D imaging system was evaluated with validation objects obtaining transversal and depth accuracies within ± 0.1 mm and ± 0.01 mm, respectively. We tested the method on 80 SPTs conducted in volunteer subjects, which resulted in 61 detected wheals. We analyzed the accuracy of the models against manual reference measurements from a physician and obtained that the parametric model 2 on average yields diameters closer to the reference measurements (model 1: -0.398 mm vs. model 2: -0.339 mm) with narrower 95% limits of agreement (model 1: [-1.58, 0.78] mm vs. model 2: [-1.39, 0.71] mm) in a Bland-Altman analysis. In one subject, we tested the reproducibility of the method by registering the forearm under five different poses obtaining a maximum coefficient of variation of 5.24% in the estimated wheal diameters. The proposed method delivers accurate and reproducible measurements of the SPT.

Indexed as

AutomationImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalAdolescentAdultAlgorithmsFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsSkin TestsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31634361
PMCPMC6802838
OpenAlexW2980924691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.