Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31634355›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Facilitators and barriers to traditional medicine use among cancer patients in Malawi.

Jacob Hill, Ryan Seguin, Twambilile Phanga, Agness Manda, Maria Chikasema, Satish Gopal, Jennifer S Smith

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Jacob HillUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9695-2166
Ryan SeguinMalawi Cancer Consortium and Regional Center of Research Excellence for non-Communicable Diseases, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Twambilile PhangaMalawi Cancer Consortium and Regional Center of Research Excellence for non-Communicable Diseases, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Agness MandaMalawi Cancer Consortium and Regional Center of Research Excellence for non-Communicable Diseases, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Maria ChikasemaMalawi Cancer Consortium and Regional Center of Research Excellence for non-Communicable Diseases, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Satish GopalUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Jennifer S SmithUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

UNC Research Fellowship in Complementary and Alternative MedicineT32AT003378 · NCCIH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Keturah Ruth Faurot, Susan Gaylord · 2007 to 2026
$7.8M
NCCIH NIH HHS T32 AT003378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasing access to conventional cancer treatment (CT) in low-income countries (LICs) is an important public health initiative to address the global burden of cancer. However, LICs have a high prevalence of use of traditional and complementary medicine (T&CM). It is important to consider the factors that influence a patient's choice to use T&CM, CT, or both for their cancer treatment.

methodsWe conducted focus groups among adult cancer patients in Lilongwe, Malawi to identify facilitators and barriers of T&CM use. Focus groups were recorded, transcribed, translated, and underwent thematic content analysis.

resultsCultural norms, T&CM access, T&CM success, and CT failure were all identified as facilitators to T&CM use. CT success and T&CM failure were identified as barriers. Access and norms appear to determine initial treatment selection, while treatment outcomes dictate continued use of T&CM or CT.

conclusionThis study identified a pragmatic and experience-based treatment selection process that aligns with the social cognitive theory of behavior and assists in comprehending the factors that influence T&CM use among cancer patients in a low resource setting.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityAdolescentAdultComplementary TherapiesFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMalawiMaleMedicine, TraditionalMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPrognosisYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31634355
PMCPMC6802829
OpenAlexW2980842043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.