Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31634022›Full record

ArticleJournal of adolescent and young adult oncology2020

Understanding Barriers to Contraception Screening and Referral in Female Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer.

Sarah F Lindsay, Elisabeth J Woodhams, Katharine O White, Mari-Lynn Drainoni, Natrina L Johnson, Leanne Yinusa-Nyahkoon

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Barriers to contraception access and use among youth: A scoping review in high-income countries.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Non-physician's challenges in sexual and reproductive health care provision for women of reproductive age with cancer: a scoping review of barriers and facilitators.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah F LindsayDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hartford Healthcare Medical Group, Hartford, Connecticut.
Elisabeth J WoodhamsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Katharine O WhiteDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mari-Lynn DrainoniDepartment of Health Law Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Natrina L JohnsonDepartment of Health Law Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Leanne Yinusa-NyahkoonDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Boston University · USUConn Health · US

Funding

Integrated Care for Addiction, HIV and HCV Research and Education (ICAHRE)T32DA041898 · NIDA · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI Rachel Sayko Adams, Michael D Stein · 2017 to 2026
$3.8M
NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA041898
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AdultContraceptionFemaleHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNeoplasmsReferral and Consultationcontraceptionfamily planningfemalereproductive health

Identifiers

PMID31634022
PMCPMC8024365
OpenAlexW2982011330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.