Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31633766›Full record

ArticleSystematic biology2020

Phylogenomic Resolution of the Cetacean Tree of Life Using Target Sequence Capture.

Michael R McGowen, Georgia Tsagkogeorga, Sandra Álvarez-Carretero, Mario Dos Reis, Monika Struebig, Robert Deaville, Paul D Jepson, Simon Jarman, Andrea Polanowski, Phillip A Morin and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Molecular divergence ofZoological research · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Michael R McGowenSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK.
Georgia TsagkogeorgaSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK.
Sandra Álvarez-CarreteroSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK.
Mario Dos ReisSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK.
Monika StruebigSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK.
Robert DeavilleInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Outer Circle, London NW1 4RY, UK.
Paul D JepsonInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Outer Circle, London NW1 4RY, UK.
Simon JarmanSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Perth WA 6009, Australia.
Andrea PolanowskiAustralian Antarctic Division, 203 Channel Highway, Kingston TAS 7050, Australia.
Phillip A MorinSouthwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, 8901 La Jolla Shores Dr., La Jolla CA 92037 USA.
Stephen J RossiterSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolution of cetaceans, from their early transition to an aquatic lifestyle to their subsequent diversification, has been the subject of numerous studies. However, although the higher-level relationships among cetacean families have been largely settled, several aspects of the systematics within these groups remain unresolved. Problematic clades include the oceanic dolphins (37 spp.), which have experienced a recent rapid radiation, and the beaked whales (22 spp.), which have not been investigated in detail using nuclear loci. The combined application of high-throughput sequencing with techniques that target specific genomic sequences provide a powerful means of rapidly generating large volumes of orthologous sequence data for use in phylogenomic studies. To elucidate the phylogenetic relationships within the Cetacea, we combined sequence capture with Illumina sequencing to generate data for $\sim $3200 protein-coding genes for 68 cetacean species and their close relatives including the pygmy hippopotamus. By combining data from $>$38,000 exons with existing sequences from 11 cetaceans and seven outgroup taxa, we produced the first comprehensive comparative genomic data set for cetaceans, spanning 6,527,596 aligned base pairs (bp) and 89 taxa. Phylogenetic trees reconstructed with maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference of concatenated loci, as well as with coalescence analyses of individual gene trees, produced mostly concordant and well-supported trees. Our results completely resolve the relationships among beaked whales as well as the contentious relationships among oceanic dolphins, especially the problematic subfamily Delphinidae. We carried out Bayesian estimation of species divergence times using MCMCTree and compared our complete data set to a subset of clocklike genes. Analyses using the complete data set consistently showed less variance in divergence times than the reduced data set. In addition, integration of new fossils (e.g., Mystacodon selenensis) indicates that the diversification of Crown Cetacea began before the Late Eocene and the divergence of Crown Delphinidae as early as the Middle Miocene. [Cetaceans; phylogenomics; Delphinidae; Ziphiidae; dolphins; whales.].

Indexed as

PhylogenyAnimalsBiodiversityCetaceaClassificationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID31633766
PMCPMC7164366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.