Trial reportJAMA internal medicine2020
Effect of Depression Screening After Acute Coronary Syndromes on Quality of Life: The CODIACS-QoL Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT01993017 (Depression Screening RCT in ACS Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Depression Screening RCT in ACS Patients: Quality of Life and Cost Outcomes
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guideline
- Recommendation on screening adults for depression using a screening tool.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025Guideline
- Evidence for the Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in the Treatment of Patients With Noncommunicable Diseases: Systematic Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Pooled it
- The use of patient-reported outcome measures to improve patient-related outcomes - a systematic review.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2024Pooled it
- Screening for depression among the general adult population and in women during pregnancy or the first-year postpartum: two systematic reviews to inform a guideline of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.Systematic reviews · 2022Guideline
- Accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for screening to detect major depression: updated systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2021Pooled it
- Differences in the Prevalence of Screen-Detected Depression After Acute Coronary Syndrome Between Health Systems in the USA: Findings from CODIACS-QoL Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Trial
- Economic outcomes of depression screening after acute coronary syndromes: The CODIACS-QoL randomized clinical trial.General hospital psychiatryTrial
- The Evolution of the Mental Health-Acute Coronary Syndrome Intersection: A 50-Year Bibliometric Mapping and Changepoint Analysis (1975-2025).Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Mental Health-Acute Coronary Syndrome Continuum: Bidirectional Pathophysiological Links and Clinical Implications.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
- Post-Myocardial Infarction Psychological Distress: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2025Review
- Review
- Integrating depression and acute coronary syndrome care in low resource hospitals in China: the I-CARE randomised clinical trial.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2024Article
- Cardiovascular Disease, Depressive Symptoms, and Heart Failure in Mexican American Aged 75 Years and Older During 12 Years of Follow Up.Journal of affective disorders reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Screening for Emotional Distress in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease.Current cardiology reports · 2023Review
- Preventive care recommendations to promote health equity.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023Article
- 'Optimal' cutoff selection in studies of depression screening tool accuracy using the PHQ-9, EPDS, or HADS-D: A meta-research study.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2023Review
- Depression Following Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and elevated depressive symptoms are at increased risk for recurrent cardiovascular events and mortality, worse quality of life, and higher health care costs. These observational findings prompted multiple scientific panels to advise universal depression screening in survivors of ACS prior to evidence from randomized screening trials. Objective: To determine whether systematically screening for depression in survivors of ACS improves quality of life and depression compared with usual care. Design, Setting, and Participants: A 3-group multisite randomized trial enrolled 1500 patients with ACS from 4 health care systems between November 1, 2013, and March 31, 2017, with follow-up ending July 31, 2018. Patients were eligible if they had been hospitalized for ACS in the previous 2 to 12 months and had no prior history of depression. All analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Interventions: Patients with ACS were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive (1) systematic depression screening using the 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire, with notification of primary care clinicians and provision of centralized, patient-preference, stepped depression care for those with positive screening results (8-item Patient Health Questionnaire score ≥10; screen, notify, and treat, n = 499); (2) systematic depression screening, with notification of primary care clinicians for those with positive screening results (screen and notify, n = 501); and (3) usual care (no screening, n = 500). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was change in quality-adjusted life-years. The secondary outcome was depression-free days. Adverse effects and mortality were assessed by patient interview and hospital records. Results: A total of 1500 patients (424 women and 1076 men; mean [SD] age, 65.9 [11.5] years) were randomized in the 18-month trial. Only 71 of 1000 eligible survivors of ACS (7.1%) had elevated 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire scores indicating depressive symptoms at screening. There were no differences in mean (SD) change in quality-adjusted life-years (screen, notify and treat, -0.06 [0.20]; screen and notify, -0.06 [0.20]; no screen, -0.06 [0.18]; P = .98) or cumulative mean (SD) depression-free days (screen, notify and treat, 343.1 [179.0] days; screen and notify, 351.3 [175.0] days; no screen, 339.0 [176.6] days; P = .63). Harms including death, bleeding, or sleep difficulties did not differ among groups. Conclusions and Relevance: In patients with ACS without a history of depression, systematic depression screening with or without providing depression treatment did not alter quality-adjusted life-years, depression-free days, or harms. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01993017.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.