Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31633596›Full record

ArticleThe American Journal of dermatopathology2020

Validation of Image Quality and Diagnostic Accuracy Using a Mobile Phone Camera Microscope Adaptor Compared With Glass Slide Review in Teledermatopathology.

Caroline W Laggis, Elizabeth E Bailey, Roberto Novoa, Campbell L Stewart, Benjamin Stoff, Karolyn A Wanat, John Barbieri, Carrie Kovarik

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The American Journal of dermatopathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Caroline W LaggisDepartment of Dermatology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Elizabeth E BaileyDepartment of Dermatology, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, CA.
Roberto NovoaDepartment of Dermatology, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, CA.
Campbell L StewartDepartment of Dermatology, UConn Health, Farmington, CT.
Benjamin StoffDepartment of Dermatology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Karolyn A WanatDepartment of Dermatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI; and.
John BarbieriDepartment of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Carrie KovarikDepartment of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

Funding

Penn Dermatology Research Training ProgramT32AR007465 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Elizabeth Anne Grice, David Joel Margolis · 1986 to 2026
$9.0M
The Microbiome of Impaired Wound HealingR00AR060873 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GRICE, ELIZABETH ANNE · 2012 to 2014
$730k
NIAMS NIH HHS R00 AR060873NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR007465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New modalities of evaluating histopathology, such as whole-slide imaging, have been validated in the field of dermatopathology but are often unfeasible and unavailable in developing countries. Widely available across the globe, mobile phone camera technology represents a potential simple and inexpensive method of imaging histologic slides through the use of a mobile phone camera microscope adaptor. This study aims to validate the use of a commercially available adaptor in the diagnosis of inflammatory and infectious conditions in dermatopathology. Representative images were taken of slides for fifty-four cases using the adaptor and shared through a cloud-based platform with five dermatopathologists who rendered diagnoses and judged the quality of the images. After a washout period of 8 weeks, the same cases were assessed by the same dermatopathologists using the original glass slides. The intraobserver concordance rate was 93.3%, and the quality of the mobile phone images was rated as "excellent" or "diagnostic" in 94.4% of the cases. This study validates the use of this low-tech and low-cost adaptor as a reliable tool in teledermatopathology. Limitations of the study include those inherent to use of the adaptor and the limited panel of diagnoses. The primary value of this device may be in developing countries, but its practicality and ease of use lend itself to use in academic and consultative settings in the developed world as well.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneDermatologyHumansMicroscopyPathology, ClinicalSkin DiseasesTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID31633596
PMCPMC7160027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.