Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31633257›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2020

Self-regulation of ventromedial prefrontal cortex activation using real-time fMRI neurofeedback-Influence of default mode network.

Ahmad Mayeli, Masaya Misaki, Vadim Zotev, Aki Tsuchiyagaito, Obada Al Zoubi, Raquel Phillips, Jared Smith, Jennifer L Stewart, Hazem Refai, Martin P Paulus and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ahmad MayeliLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Masaya MisakiLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Vadim ZotevLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Aki TsuchiyagaitoLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Obada Al ZoubiLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Raquel PhillipsLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Jared SmithLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Jennifer L StewartLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Hazem RefaiElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of Oklahoma, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Martin P PaulusLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Oklahoma.
Jerzy BodurkaLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Oklahoma.ORCID 0000-0003-0053-9746

Funding

The Center for Neuroscience-based Mental Health Assessment and Prediction (NEUROMAP)P20GM121312 · NIGMS · LAUREATE INSTITUTE FOR BRAIN RESEARCH · PI Masaya Misaki · 2017 to 2026
$23.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM121312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) is involved in regulation of negative emotion and decision-making, emotional and behavioral control, and active resilient coping. This pilot study examined the feasibility of training healthy subjects (n = 27) to self-regulate the vmPFC activity using a real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging neurofeedback (rtfMRI-nf). Participants in the experimental group (EG, n = 18) were provided with an ongoing vmPFC hemodynamic activity (rtfMRI-nf signal represented as variable-height bar). Individuals were instructed to raise the bar by self-relevant value-based thinking. Participants in the control group (CG, n = 9) performed the same task; however, they were provided with computer-generated sham neurofeedback signal. Results demonstrate that (a) both the CG and the EG show a higher vmPFC fMRI signal at the baseline than during neurofeedback training; (b) no significant positive training effect was seen in the vmPFC across neurofeedback runs; however, the medial prefrontal cortex, middle temporal gyri, inferior frontal gyri, and precuneus showed significant decreasing trends across the training runs only for the EG; (c) the vmPFC rtfMRI-nf signal associated with the fMRI signal across the default mode network (DMN). These findings suggest that it may be difficult to modulate a single DMN region without affecting other DMN regions. Observed decreased vmPFC activity during the neurofeedback task could be due to interference from the fMRI signal within other DMN network regions, as well as interaction with task-positive networks. Even though participants in the EG did not show significant positive increase in the vmPFC activity among neurofeedback runs, they were able to learn to accommodate the demand of self-regulation task to maintain the vmPFC activity with the help of a neurofeedback signal.

Indexed as

Functional NeuroimagingSelf-ControlAdultCerebral CortexDefault Mode NetworkFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeurofeedbackPilot ProjectsPrefrontal Cortexbraindefault mode networkemotionfMRI Neurofeedbackfunctional connectivityself-regulationvmPFC

Identifiers

PMID31633257
PMCPMC7267960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.