ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2019
IHC Color Histograms for Unsupervised Ki67 Proliferation Index Calculation.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unveiling the biological side of PET-derived biomarkers: a simulation-based approach applied to PDAC assessment.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Ki-67 as a Prognostic Marker in Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Vulva: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Revolutionizing the treatment of intervertebral disc degeneration: an approach based on molecular typing.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Automated AI-based grading of neuroendocrine tumors using Ki-67 proliferation index: comparative evaluation and performance analysis.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024Article
- AI improves accuracy, agreement and efficiency of pathologists for Ki67 assessments in breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Photochemically Aided Arteriovenous Fistula Creation to Accelerate Fistula Maturation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Tissue microarrey: a potential cost-effective approach for mismatch repair testing in colorectal cancer.BMC gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Review
- A Method for Unsupervised Semi-Quantification of Inmunohistochemical Staining with Beta Divergences.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Automated Analysis of Proliferating Cells Spatial Organisation Predicts Prognosis in Lung Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.Cancers · 2021Article
- PathoNet introduced as a deep neural network backend for evaluation of Ki-67 and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- piNET-An Automated Proliferation Index Calculator Framework for Ki67 Breast Cancer Images.Cancers · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Automated image analysis tools for Ki67 breast cancer digital pathology images would have significant value if integrated into diagnostic pathology workflows. Such tools would reduce the workload of pathologists, while improving efficiency, and accuracy. Developing tools that are robust and reliable to multicentre data is challenging, however, differences in staining protocols, digitization equipment, staining compounds, and slide preparation can create variabilities in image quality and color across digital pathology datasets. In this work, a novel unsupervised color separation framework based on the IHC color histogram (IHCCH) is proposed for the robust analysis of Ki67 and hematoxylin stained images in multicentre datasets. An "overstaining" threshold is implemented to adjust for background overstaining, and an automated nuclei radius estimator is designed to improve nuclei detection. Proliferation index and F1 scores were compared between the proposed method and manually labeled ground truth data for 30 TMA cores that have ground truths for Ki67+ and Ki67- nuclei. The method accurately quantified the PI over the dataset, with an average proliferation index difference of 3.25%. To ensure the method generalizes to new, diverse datasets, 50 Ki67 TMAs from the Protein Atlas were used to test the validated approach. As the ground truth for this dataset is PI ranges, the automated result was compared to the PI range. The proposed method correctly classified 74 out of 80 TMA images, resulting in a 92.5% accuracy. In addition to these validations experiments, performance was compared to two color-deconvolution based methods, and to six machine learning classifiers. In all cases, the proposed work maintained more consistent (reproducible) results, and higher PI quantification accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.