Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31632894›Full record

ArticleGlobal social welfare : research, policy & practice2019

Implementing Evidence-Based HIV Prevention for Female Sex Workers in Mexico: Provider Assessments of Feasibility and Acceptability.

Lawrence A Palinkas, Mee Young Um, Gregory A Aarons, Claudia Rafful, Claudia V Chavarin, Doroteo V Mendoza, Hugo Staines, Thomas L Patterson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global social welfare : research, policy & practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Commentary: Equity and Exchange in Global Research-Practice Partnerships.Global social welfare : research, policy & practice · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lawrence A PalinkasSuzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA USA.
Mee Young UmSuzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA USA.
Gregory A AaronsDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA USA.
Claudia RaffulDivision of Global Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA USA.
Claudia V ChavarinDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA USA.
Doroteo V MendozaResearch and Evaluation Unit, Mexican Foundation for Family Planning (MexFam), Mexico City, Mexico.
Hugo StainesFaculty of Biomedical Sciences, Autonomous University of Ciudad Juarez, Ciudad Juárez, Chihuahua, Mexico.
Thomas L PattersonDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA USA.
University of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Southern California · USMexfam · MXUniversidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez · MX

Funding

Implementation of an efficacious intervention for High Risk Women in MexicoR01MH087054 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI AARONS, GREGORY, PATTERSON, THOMAS L. · 2010 to 2014
$3.6M
AIDS International Training Program in the US Mexico Border RegionD43TW008633 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI STRATHDEE, STEFFANIE A. · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW008633NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH087054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined service provider perceptions of feasibility and acceptability of implementing evidence-based practices for preventing HIV/AIDS and STIs in female sex workers (FSWs) in Mexico. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 124 directors, supervisors and counselors from 12 reproductive health clinics located throughout Mexico participating in a large randomized controlled trial to scale-up the use of a psychoeducational intervention designed to promote FSW condom use and enhance safer sex negotiation skills. Feasibility was based on assessment of personal, organizational and social costs, benefits, and capacity. Costs included anxiety over intervention competency, purchase of condoms and other supplies, expenses of laboratory tests for HIV/STIs, and stigma associated with FSWs. Benefits included increase in personal knowledge and experience, enhanced clinic reputation and service delivery capacity, and increased public health. Capacity was expressed in terms of provider skills to deliver the intervention and additional workload. Acceptability was expressed in terms of provider enthusiasm in delivering these services and FSWs willingness to receive the services. Service provider evaluations of feasibility and acceptability of implementing evidence-based prevention interventions are grounded in local contexts that define costs and benefits of and capacity for implementation and determine features of the intervention and its implementation that are acceptable.

Indexed as

evidence-based interventionsfemale sex workersHIV preventionimplementationlow and middle income countriesMexico

Identifiers

PMID31632894
PMCPMC6800729
OpenAlexW2802277606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.