Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31632710›Full record

ArticleSpinal cord series and cases2019

Construct validity, test-retest reliability, and the ability to detect change of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in a spinal cord injury population.

Anna Berardi, Giovanni Galeoto, Domenico Guarino, Maria Auxiliadora Marquez, Rita De Santis, Donatella Valente, Giulia Caporale, Marco Tofani

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Spinal cord series and cases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Occupational performance in Huntington's disease: A cross-sectional study.The British journal of occupational therapy · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anna Berardi1Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni Galeoto2Department of Public Health and Infectious Disease, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9043-5686
Domenico Guarino3Montecatone Rehabilitation Institute S.P.A, Imola, Italy.
Maria Auxiliadora MarquezParaplegic Center Ostia, Ostia, Italy.
Rita De Santis5Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Donatella Valente6Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Giulia Caporale1Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Marco Tofani7Neurorehabilitation Unit, Department of Neurosciences and Neurorehabilitation Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2071-4513

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study design: Cross-sectional study. Objectives: To examine the construct validity and the ability to detect change, of the Italian version of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) in a spinal cord injury (SCI) population. Settings: Rehabilitation service of the Paraplegic Center of Ostia, Italy. Methods: Thirty-nine spinal cord injury participants were recruited. The clinimetric properties of the measure were assessed following international guidelines. Cronbach's alpha and the intraclass correlation coefficient were assessed for internal consistency and test-retest reliability, respectively. Construct validity was evaluated, by calculating correlation between COPM and the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) through Pearson's correlation coefficient and Spearman's Rho. The ability to detect change was evaluated on the overall sample. Results: The COPM was shown to be reliable in a spinal cord injury sample with positive and statistically significant results for Cronbach's alpha (0.89) and ICC (0.99 for the performance subtest and 0.98 for the satisfaction subtest). Correlation coefficients did not show a correlation between the COPM total score and the SCIM. The COPM scores improved significantly during in-patient rehabilitation, moreover the mean change between the start of treatment and the end of the therapy as evaluated with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was -4.25 points for the performance score and -2.96 points for the satisfaction score. Conclusions: This study showed that the COPM is a reliable tool for assessing SCI clients' perceived performance of daily activities and their satisfaction with their performance.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingDisability EvaluationSpinal Cord InjuriesAdultFemaleHumansItalyLanguageMaleMiddle AgedOccupational TherapyReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslatingPatient educationQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID31632710
PMCPMC6786371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.