ArticleSpinal cord series and cases2019
Treatment and cost of pressure injury stage III or IV in four patients with spinal cord injury: the Basel Decubitus Concept.
Article in Spinal cord series and cases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of a computerized decision support system on the treatment approach of stage III or IV pressure injury in patients with spinal cord injury: a feasibility study.BMC health services research · 2023Trial
- Multifaceted Pathophysiology and Secondary Complications of Chronic Spinal Cord Injury: Focus on Pressure Injury.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Various Flaps Used for Reconstruction of Pressure Injuries: A Narrative Review.World journal of plastic surgery · 2025Review
- Article
- Treatment approaches of stage III and IV pressure injury in people with spinal cord injury: A scoping review.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Risk factors for hospital acquired pressure injury in patients with spinal cord injury during first rehabilitation: prospective cohort study.Spinal cord · 2022Observational
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study design: Retrospective chart analyses as part of a quality improvement project. Objectives: To demonstrate treatment of pressure injury (PI) in patients with spinal cord injuries (SCI) and analyse costs using the "modified Basel Decubitus Concept". Setting: Inpatient setting of a specialised acute care and rehabilitation clinic for SCI. Methods: Complex treatment courses of four patients with chronic SCI and PI stage III or IV were described and costs were recorded. The total healthcare services' costs per patient and different profession's involvement were analysed in relation to patient characteristics, treatment phases and milestones demonstrated. Results: The treatment of PI stage III and IV in patients with SCI included input from plastic surgery, rehabilitation medicine, nursing and other involved professions. Recommended interventions were chosen according to the "modified Basel Decubitus Concept". The cost course of PI treatment in patients with SCI depicted the multimodal treatment concept, including three clinically and financially relevant milestones (debridement, flap surgery and mobilisation to wheelchair) as well as the highest costs in the functionally highly dependent patient. Acute care and rehabilitation overlapped with different intensities during the whole treatment process. Conclusion: Multimodal treatment concepts connecting acute and rehabilitation care were applied in these complex health conditions. Cost-explication models including treatment phases and milestones helped to understand resources more easily and integrate aspects of process-based management and quality of care. Scientific evidence is needed to create a recommended quality standard in line with adequate financing of this health condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.