ArticleDigital health
Academia-industry digital health collaborations: A cross-cultural analysis of barriers and facilitators.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conversational AI Phone Calls to Support Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR cardio · 2025Trial
- Collaborating Across Organizational Boundaries to Develop, Evaluate, and Implement eHealth: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Decades in the Making: The Evolution of Digital Health Research Infrastructure Through Synthetic Data, Common Data Models, and Federated Learning.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Challenges and solutions to banning the advertisement of unhealthy products: a qualitative study.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Mechanisms of Intersectoral Collaboration in the Health System: A Scoping Review.Iranian journal of public health · 2023Article
- Barriers and facilitators to utilizing digital health technologies by healthcare professionals.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Review
- The engagement of nursing and healthcare researchers with digital technologies: lessons learnt in an Australian university.Journal of research in nursing : JRN · 2022Article
- Successes of and Lessons From the First Joint eHealth Program of the Dutch University Hospitals: Evaluation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- An Iterative and Collaborative End-to-End Methodology Applied to Digital Mental Health.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- Benefits, Facilitators, and Recommendations for Digital Health Academic-Industry Collaboration: A Mini Review.Frontiers in digital health · 2021Review
- Development and Fidelity Testing of the Test@Work Digital Toolkit for Employers on Workplace Health Checks and Opt-In HIV Testing.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Artificial intelligence and nursing science: Opportunities, challenges, implications, and guidelines.Nursing outlookArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDevelopment and uptake of digital health technologies benefit from cross-sectoral efforts from academia and industry. Our study aims to identify the barriers and facilitators associated with academia-industry collaborations in digital health in middle- and high-income countries.
methodsTrained personnel conducted semi-structured interviews with 23 stakeholders who were active in industry, academia or both. Stakeholders were based in middle-income countries (including China) and high-income countries (including the United States) as defined by the World Bank. Interviews were conducted in the stakeholder's language of choice (Chinese,
resultsStakeholders in both academia and industry identified complementary roles, authentic communication between partners, and clearly outlined goals or expectations prior to the collaboration as primary facilitators for success. Misaligned goals or expectations, differences in timelines for productivity and difficulties balancing expectations for business outcomes versus generation of scientific evidence were identified as primary barriers. Stakeholders in high-income countries reported inauthentic communication as a significant barrier to collaboration, whereas those in middle-income countries did not.
conclusionOutlining and communicating openly about goals and expectations for timeline and priorities as well as establishing complementary roles will facilitate fruitful academia-industry collaborations in the future. Best practices for communication styles may be dependent on the cultural setting, and thus should be adopted accordingly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.