Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31632683›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of kidney health and disease2019

Electronic Advice Request System for Nephrology in Alberta: Pilot Results and Implementation.

Aminu K Bello, Deenaz Zaidi, Branko Braam, Sophia Chou, Mark Courtney, Vinay Deved, Jodi Glassford, Kailash Jindal, Scott Klarenbach, Mohammed Osman and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of kidney health and disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Aminu K BelloDivision of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Deenaz ZaidiDivision of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5546-684X
Branko BraamDivision of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Sophia ChouDivision of Nephrology, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.
Mark CourtneyDivision of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Vinay DevedDivision of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Jodi GlassfordAlberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada.
Kailash JindalDivision of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Scott KlarenbachDivision of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Mohammed OsmanDivision of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Nairne Scott-DouglasAlberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada.
Sabin ShurrawDivision of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Stephanie ThompsonDivision of Nephrology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Braden MannsDivision of Nephrology, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8823-6127
Brenda HemmelgarnDivision of Nephrology, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.
Marcello TonelliDivision of Nephrology, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResidents of rural areas of Alberta face significant barriers regarding access to specialist care, resulting in delays in provision of optimal care. Electronic referral and consultation systems are promising tools for facilitating timely access to specialist care, especially for people living in rural locations.

objectiveTo report our initial experience with the launch of an electronic advice request system for ambulatory kidney care in Alberta, Canada.

methodsWe analyzed electronic advice requests for nephrology services in Alberta after the system's pilot launch, from October 2016 to December 2017. Data for province-wide advice request utility by primary care providers (PCPs) were extracted from Alberta Netcare for analysis.

resultsThe total number of electronic advice requests directed to nephrology was 118 (mean number of requests: 2 per week). Only 31 (26.3%) of the cases required a face-to-face clinic visit with a nephrologist. Most (87; 73.7%) cases were managed by PCPs with ongoing nephrologist support via the advice request tool. Typical nephrologist response time was 5.7 ± 0.6 (mean ± SEM) days.

conclusionThese preliminary data suggest that the electronic advice request program has potential to enhance timely access to specialist kidney care and minimize unnecessary nephrologist visits while reducing response time. Broad implementation of this system may have a substantial positive impact on health outcomes and improve cost-effectiveness for nephrology care in the long term, particularly in rural communities of Alberta.

Indexed as

chronic kidney disease (CKD)electronic advice (eAdvice)electronic referraleReferral advice requestprimary care providers

Identifiers

PMID31632683
PMCPMC6778992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.