ArticleEcology and evolution2019
Detection error influences both temporal seroprevalence predictions and risk factors associations in wildlife disease models.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Disease Progression and Serological Assay Performance in Heritage Breed Pigs followingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The prevalence of rodent-borne zoonotic pathogens in the South Gobi desert region of Mongolia.Infection ecology & epidemiology · 2023Article
- Genomic regions associated with pseudorabies virus infection status in naturally infected feral swine (Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- A framework for surveillance of emerging pathogens at the human-animal interface: Pigs and coronaviruses as a case study.Preventive veterinary medicine · 2021Article
- Detection error influences both temporal seroprevalence predictions and risk factors associations in wildlife disease models.Ecology and evolution · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the prevalence of pathogens in invasive species is essential to guide efforts to prevent transmission to agricultural animals, wildlife, and humans. Pathogen prevalence can be difficult to estimate for wild species due to imperfect sampling and testing (pathogens may not be detected in infected individuals and erroneously detected in individuals that are not infected). The invasive wild pig (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.