ArticleThe annals of applied statistics2018
A SIMULATION-BASED FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING THE FEASIBILITY OF RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING FOR ESTIMATING CHARACTERISTICS IN POPULATIONS OF LESBIAN, GAY AND BISEXUAL OLDER ADULTS.
Article in The annals of applied statistics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- HIV Treatment Optimism Moderates the Relationship between Sexual Risk Behavior and HIV Risk Perception among Urban HIV-negative Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men who have Sex With Men.AIDS and behavior · 2024Article
- A SIMULATION-BASED FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING THE FEASIBILITY OF RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING FOR ESTIMATING CHARACTERISTICS IN POPULATIONS OF LESBIAN, GAY AND BISEXUAL OLDER ADULTS.The annals of applied statistics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is a method for sampling from a target population by leveraging social connections. RDS is invaluable to the study of hard-to-reach populations. However, RDS is costly and can be infeasible. RDS is infeasible when RDS point estimators have small effective sample sizes (large design effects) or when RDS interval estimators have large confidence intervals relative to estimates obtained in previous studies or poor coverage. As a result, researchers need tools to assess whether or not estimation of certain characteristics of interest for specific populations is feasible in advance. In this paper, we develop a simulation-based framework for using pilot data-in the form of a convenience sample of aggregated, egocentric data and estimates of subpopulation sizes within the target population-to assess whether or not RDS is feasible for estimating characteristics of a target population. in doing so, we assume that more is known about egos than alters in the pilot data, which is often the case with aggregated, egocentric data in practice. We build on existing methods for estimating the structure of social networks from aggregated, egocentric sample data and estimates of subpopulation sizes within the target population. We apply this framework to assess the feasibility of estimating the proportion male, proportion bisexual, proportion depressed and proportion infected with HIV/AIDS within three spatially distinct target populations of older lesbian, gay and bisexual adults using pilot data from the caring and Aging with Pride Study and the Gallup Daily Tracking Survey. We conclude that using an RDS sample of 300 subjects is infeasible for estimating the proportion male, but feasible for estimating the proportion bisexual, proportion depressed and proportion infected with HIV/AIDS in all three target populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.