Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31632501›Full record

ArticleJournal of Cancer2019

Comparative safety and effectiveness of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation combined with preoperative three-dimensional reconstruction versus surgical resection for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma of 3-5 cm.

Yuanfeng Gong, Yunqiang Tang, Yan Geng, Yu Zhou, Min Yu, Bowen Huang, Zhonghai Sun, Hui Tang, Zhixiang Jian, Baohua Hou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Evolution of surgical treatment for hepatolithiasis.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yuanfeng GongDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, No.106 Zhongshan 2nd Rd, Yuexiu Dist, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Yunqiang TangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, No.78 Hengzhigang Rd, Yuexiu Dist, Guangzhou 510095, China.
Yan GengDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, No.106 Zhongshan 2nd Rd, Yuexiu Dist, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Yu ZhouDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, No.106 Zhongshan 2nd Rd, Yuexiu Dist, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Min YuDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, No.106 Zhongshan 2nd Rd, Yuexiu Dist, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Bowen HuangDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, No.106 Zhongshan 2nd Rd, Yuexiu Dist, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Zhonghai SunDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, No.106 Zhongshan 2nd Rd, Yuexiu Dist, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Hui TangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, No.78 Hengzhigang Rd, Yuexiu Dist, Guangzhou 510095, China.
Zhixiang JianDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, No.106 Zhongshan 2nd Rd, Yuexiu Dist, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Baohua HouDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, No.106 Zhongshan 2nd Rd, Yuexiu Dist, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences · CNGuangdong Provincial People's Hospital · CNGuangzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the safety and effectiveness of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) combined with preoperative three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction versus surgical resection for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma of 3-5 cm.

methodsThe cohort of this retrospective study included 66 consecutive patients who underwent open hepatectomy (Surgery group) between January 2009 and December 2014, as well as 54 consecutive patients who underwent ultrasound-guided RFA combined with preoperative 3D reconstruction (RFA group) during the same period. Preoperative 3D reconstruction was performed using Myrian-XP-Liver software. The image fusion system was used to evaluate the RFA safety margin at 1 month after surgery. Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to compare the recurrence and overall survival (OS) rates between the two treatment groups.

resultsThere were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics of the two groups. The complete ablation rate was 94.4% (51/53). As compared with surgical resection for solitary HCC of 3-5 cm, ultrasound-guided RFA combined with preoperative 3D reconstruction significantly reduced the morbidity of excessive pain, total complications, and infections (

conclusionUltrasound-guided RFA combined with preoperative 3D reconstruction appears to be a safe and effective therapeutic option for patients with solitary HCC of 3-5 cm.

Indexed as

hepatectomyhepatocellular carcinomaradiofrequency ablationthree-dimensional image fusionthree-dimensional reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID31632501
PMCPMC6775701
OpenAlexW2972723791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.